I was not even fucking charged

I was going through all of the documents in preparation for the hearing tomorrow and found a document that took me back; I was not even charged

This is the full email to Bristol County Court

3pm 03.04.22 Hender v Leverton 239MC050 – VERY URGENT

This message was sent with High importance.

DH

David Hender

Mon 02/05/2022 16:26

To:

  • e-filing.bristol.countycourt

Cc:

  • civil.litigation@hampshire

Please see the attached from my custody record; I WAS NOT EVEN CHARGED

I was in custody for over 9 hours, found guilty in my absence and arrested in Wales

If it is Judge Gorman who is going to preside, she must rule in my favour and set aside the judgement that led to me being arrested in Wales and being on remand in Swansea prison for a month, under suicide watch and demand that Hampshire Police pay me significant compensation

Regards

I was not even charged but went through hell

I was going through all of the documents in preparation for the hearing tomorrow and found an email that took me back; I was not even charged

This is the full email to Bristol County Court

3pm 03.04.22 Hender v Leverton 239MC050 – VERY URGENT

This message was sent with High importance.

DH

David Hender

Mon 02/05/2022 16:26

To:

  • e-filing.bristol.countycourt

Cc:

  • civil.litigation@hampshire
Attachment thumbnail

Please see the attached from my custody record; I WAS NOT EVEN CHARGED

I was in custody for over 9 hours, found guilty in my absence and arrested in Wales

If it is Judge Gorman who is going to preside, she must rule in my favour and set aside the judgement that led to me being arrested in Wales and being on remand in Swansea prison for a month, under suicide watch and demand that Hampshire Police pay me significant compensation

Regards

It just goes to show that society and the media are misandrist and sexist

It is reported that a FEMALE stalker was pestering Noel Gallagher and she finally found her way to his bedroom door and was wrestled to the ground by security but I doubt that she was wrestled.

She was released, surprise, surprise and was seen in a coffee shop next to his hotel.

The GB News so called celebrity reporter just merely brushed it off. What would have been her reaction if the tables had been turned and the stalker had been a man?

Now, be absolutely honest with me and yourself. If the celebrity had been a woman and the stalker was a man, he would be in jail by now and NOT in a coffee shop

A message to Lisa Mayhew, Co chair of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, Ron Downhill, Consultant to the same and Clare Edwards/Andrew Lugg, trust officers to the Hender Family Settlement

Loan interest on my and my brother’s loans

This message was sent with High importance

DH

David Hender

Sun 01/05/2022 19:17

To:

  • Clare Edwards (Paicolex);
  • Ron Downhill;
  • Andrew Lugg (Paicolex Chairman)

+1 other (Lisa Mayhew)

Trust letter interest at 2.5%.pdf

trust letter interest at 2.99%.pdf

Loan Agreement executed by Adriatic dated 28 October 2015 (44820130 Legal).PDF

Show all 3 attachments (6 MB)Download all

Dear Trustees,

The Trustees Act 2000 does not apply as the trust deed was executed, under section 32 of the Trustee Act 1925, before the 2000 act, although the loans to myself and my brother were effected after 2000, in which case the provisions of the 2000 act DO APPLY.

“The trustees are allowed to provide interest free loans to beneficiaries but that the loan to one beneficiary must not affect the other beneficiary”.

It is clear that the loan to my brother, to purchase the investment for HFP Investments Limited, was provided on an interest free basis. That is proven by the fact that my brother did not charge any interest to the company for the loan. Any other permutation would have been financial suicide.

With regard to my loan agreement, which contains no repayment terms, interest had to be charged in order to prevent the loan arrangement being classified by HMRC as a benefit in kind. It was stated at 2% over base.

However, Andrew Lugg stated that the “loan would accrue interest at 2.5%”. He gave no calculation of this rate of interest, whereas I tracked the bank rate and added 2%, although the 2% added interest was punitive and already in excess of any mortgage rate. I consider this to be shoddy. This rate of 2.5% was included in his letter of 23rd January 2018 and, for the moment, I am disregarding the efficacy of the loan principal itself, which I have already proved to be completely false and uplifted by the trust officers, Andrew Lugg and Clare Edwards, at my father’s behest, being amounts allegedly owed to him, which should never have been included as part of the loan agreement anyway.

But in Clare Edwards’ and Andrew Lugg’s letter of 15th March 2022, the interest rate had increased to 2.99%. This is contrary to Andrew Lugg’s letter of 23rd January 2018. The bank base rate did not even increase until 17th March 2022 and there was no justification of any increase in interest, or indeed any capital repayment of which there are no provisions in the 2015 loan agreement

It is as though Edwards and Lugg just put a wet finger in the air and chose an interest rate that bears absolutely no resemblance to anything.

Returning to my brother’s loan of £1.4M (approx), by virtue of the fact that no interest was charged, it was not only contrary to the Trustees Act 2000 but it denigrated the value of the trust. Furthermore, by writing off the entire loan and filing a legal document to the effect that the charge attached to the loan had been satisfied, was not only an egregious breach of the trust officers’ legal and fiduciary duties to the trust but, by not charging one beneficiary interest, but by charging the other interest, they have breached the Trustees Act 2000.

The write off of the loan and the provision of the loan on an interest free basis are also contrary to the rules with regard to benefits in kind of beneficiaries.

Given that all loan agreements were/are governed by the laws of England and Wales, they have also breached the law and have committed a crime by:

  • Charging one beneficiary interest and not the other, therefore reducing the value of the trust
  • Varying the interest rate, contrary to the loan agreement
  • Filing an unlawful and untruthful document with the Registrar of Companies
  • Writing off the loan to Martin Hender and therefore reducing the value of the trust

These criminal activities, undertaken by Clare Edwards and Andrew Lugg, trust officers to the Hender Family Settlement are in addition to the egregious acts of paying one beneficiary more than the other, which was detailed in the document “Inequalities in the trust”, encompassed in my email to Clare Edwards, Andrew Lugg and Ron Downhill on the 14th April 2022 at 8.38 UK time.

Clare Edwards, Andrew Lugg and Ron Downhill, the legal advisor to the trustees/trust officers, have therefore criminally breached the laws of England and Wales.

Not only should all of those mentioned in this email be immediately removed from office but substantial compensation is to be paid to David Hender, who has been caused physical, mental and financial harm.

In addition, the co chair of Berwin Leighton Paisner/ The Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner merged partnership should also immediately resign, as she has been aware of the egregious actions towards me for many years and being the senior partner of the Berwin Leighton Paisner partnership, which is the sole shareholder of Paicolex Trust Management AG, should take the ultimate responsibility for the actions of her ultimate employees and consultants.

Therefore, this document, as well as the others will be submitted to the following:

  • The police
  • HMRC
  • Fraud office

Kind regards

A letter to the family trust regarding inequalities

Regular readers of my blog will know that on top of the issues that I have had with the Police, I have been fighting the trust. I know believe that having married various documents together, I have proved that my brother has received millions more than me, all at the behest of my father who has treated the trust like a private piggy bank.

Given the cost of living crisis that has affected me as well as everyone else, I am reticent in publishing the letter as we are talking about large sums of money. But anyone who knows me, knows that I am more interested in the principal of the matter rather than the money itself.

What is the price of a life that I have lost?

Since 2016, my life has been very grim, with false accusations and many arrests. My life has been on hold for more than 6 years now and I am quite frankly just existing. I need some of this money to enable me to start a new life for the nth time

Here is the email.

Inequalities in the trust

This message was sent with High importance.

This message was sent with High importance.

DH

David Hender

Thu 14/04/2022 08:38

To:

  • Clare Edwards (Paicolex);
  • Andrew Lugg (Paicolex Chairman)

Hender_30.7.2019.pdf

This letter was signed by the both of you, as you will see from the attached document and, as such, is legally binding.

You have listed all of the dividends that were paid by the trust to the date of the letter.

In the schedule of dividends at the end of the letter, you have categorically stated 

  • That Martin had been paid an extra £77,000 when in your words, it was “previous imbalances in David’s favour”. In fact, I should have been paid that sum, not Martin
  • That Martin was indeed paid twice i.e. £400,000 with payments being made on 11/4/2018 and 14/5/2018, each of £200,000
  • That you stated that I had to declare in my tax return, my genuine income of £200,000 but you deducted the entire amount of unsubstantiated loans of £23.633.68 and that since that date, you have still been deducting both capital and interest. You have been illegally deducting me, taking the entire amount out in one go and then again deducting from my income “instalment amounts” and have been paying over the money to my father ever since. In fact, you treated the unsubstantiated amounts differently from the core loan, in that you deducted it immediately

You have both knowing broken every rule with regards to the trust and your duties of care as trust officers.

This letter will be sent to the London managing partner and chairperson of Berwin Leighton, as it is now and you will both lose your jobs.

I have always stated from the outset that there had been a campaign against me, incited by my father with you, as well as Ron Downhill, being the knowing pawns and that this has substantially affected both my mental and physical health.

I will demand that

You will repay me all of the amounts that I was underpaid, with interest paid at 2.99% and that I receive a compensation figure of £10m immediately, from either Paicolex or its holding shareholder, Berwin Leighton Paisner. As to the interest rate, Andrew Lugg stated that the loan was accruing interest at 2.5%, whereas you have now charged me a rate of 2.99%

In addition, I am repaid back all monies that have been paid by me since the legally executed loan balance reduced to £180,000; the amount that was supposed to be paid by my father in lieu of the capital payment to Rosanna, to comply with the verbal contract between them.

In addition, the interest free loan that Martin took out with you is still outstanding in the accounts of HFP Investments for the year ended 30th November 2021 but according to Companies House, the loan has been repaid, as of 26th October 2020. It has not been repaid but simply written off by ASC at my father’s command. You are entitled to dispute this but the only way that you can prove my statement to be false is to provide copies of the bank statements that show the monies have been repaid.You have always charged me interest on the loan when I got divorced. But you have never charged my brother interest. This state of affairs is not compliant with the Trustees Act 2000.

As a condition of this settlement, Martin will actually repay the £1.4m of monies to ASC, with all interest being paid at 2.9% and I will have copies of all correspondence, the ASC accounts to present and will receive them thereafter.

No one else, other than the legal beneficiaries, will receive any further sums from the trust/ASC and all monies paid to date to or on behalf of Francesca Hender, Iyshea Hender and Verity Hender will be repaid in full with punitive interest charged at 2.99% and in terms of Verity Hender, any rental agreement of a property will be immediately terminated and any property purchased on her behalf will be immediately sold. The trust officers have breached the trust deed by distributing capital to family members who are not bona fidei beneficiaries. You have thus failed to comply with the trust deed which dictates a maintenance of all capital.

Although not a Paicolex issue, the will of my father will revert to that before the death of my mother and if my father does not want to see prison bars instead of his garden at Timberchace, he will comply with this, as he has committed fraud of the utmost gravity in league with you as trustees. I will receive a copy of his will that relates to what was current before the death of my mother and confirmation that all future wills have been superceded and cancelled. The will provided to me will be previously have been presented to a notary with sworn confirmation that no will shall supercede the version that has been notarised.

Relating to my father, he will pay me personal compensation of £5m for what he has done to me, in losing my daughter who was my world and for causing me so much physical and mental distress, to the extent that I wished to kill myself. Out of sheer spite, he has done all of this to me, starting with the sexual abuse when I was a boy. 

Relating to Verity, she will make a statement under oath that she was not affected by any of the emails that I sent to her and that she was malicious in saying that it was harassment. Her mother will do likewise, stating that the complaints made to the police were at the instigation of my father. 

The house in Wales inhabited by my cousin and owned by my father will immediately be sold, with the total receipts being received by me. This is for her sheer betrayal, after everything that I have done for her over so many years, in this country and in Canada.

Furthermore, Verity will issue a separate sworn statement stating that she falsely accused me of sexual abuse at the instigation of my father, with the payment of money in consideration.

The sworn statements will then be issued to the court and the charge and sentence of harassment will be expunged, together with the issue surrounding the allegations of abuse and actual bodily harm, with my record again being expunged and I will receive sizeable compensation from Hampshire and Surrey police for the way that I was treated, firstly in the false arrest in 2016 when I was falsely accused of sexual abuse and secondly, in the manner that I was arrested for not attending a voluntary interview, even though I was severely agoraphobic. 

Furthermore, my father will make a sworn statement that due to his masonic connections, he was complicit with my arrest and charge in relation to the alleged harassment. I make no promise as to whether I will write a new will to include my daughter as a beneficiary in my will.

As my B shares in ASC are legally binding, 50% of all assets and retained profits of ASC will be transferred to another entity and then the B shares will be cancelled. In addition, due to my brother’s complicity in all activities against me, 20% of the assets and retained profits of his share will be transferred to my B shares before the cancellation and transfer.

A trust lawyer of good repute, will have a field day with the information that were legally provided by the trust and this could lead to the break up of Paicolex and will have serious inevitable consequences to the Bryan Cave/Berwin Leighton relationship 

Regards

This is why I will never vote until major changes are made

Neil Oliver, the king of the perfect monologue. This is his take on the pathetic state of the parliament and the behaviour of our MPs.

He is totally right; just look at the children’s playground purporting to be prime minister’s questions at midday on a Wednesday

For what it is worth, just don’t vote

A plea from Jeremy Bamber

Jeremy is my friend, although I have never met him.

He is INNOCENT of all crimes but is currently behind bars for LIFE and I mean LIFE.

It was a corrupt investigation from the start and those who provided evidence to put him behind bars, are living in his parents’ estate.

The ONLY reason that he is still behind bars is because, if he is released, the police will have to pay a fortune in compensation; he has been behind bars for FORTY YEARS.

This is the message received today

Media’s selective eyesight- The porn allegations- GB News are fucking misandrists

The principal of English law is innocent to proven guilty

This is the message that I sent but they did not mention the bit that is highlighted

It is so clear that GB News are no different from the rest of the outlets. They just want a story and do not care if the chap is innocent. As I said, if he is guilty, he should go

David10:32 AM (1 hour ago)
to gbviews

Dear Esther and Phil,

Before there has been any investigation, the entire media is damning this man. We all know that if we click on a wrong link, we can be subjected to porn or anything else. It has become a trial by the media.

Not read on air

It is quite simple. Hand over the phone and examine the links. If it was a dodgy link, then he should be cleared. But if he was continually watching porn, which will be clearly obvious, then he should go

David

GB News is no different to the Police – Find them guilty first and ask the proper questions later. They are quite happy to ruin a man’s career before he is even found guilty; just for viewing figures

Hender V Leverton#2 – I am not suing the Chief Constable of Hampshire, Olivia Pinkney

Since publishing the previous post, I have sent much more to the court

Below is the series of emails that I sent

3pm 3.05.22 Hender V Leverton 239MC050

This message was sent with High importance.

This message was sent with High importance.

DH

David Hender

Thu 28/04/2022 19:11To:

  • e-filing.bristol.countycourt@justice.gov.uk
Attachment thumbnail

I have just been reviewing all of the papers with regard to my arrest that I scanned and stored on my computer.

Unbelievably, I now see that I was not even formally charged. See excerpt from the documents that I received

The case against me has to be dismissed and the judge must rule in my favour; he or she has no choice whatsoever.

Regards