Featured

I am suing Surrey Police, I have had enough of all their cover ups

Well, despite the incredible interest in the posts relating to Surrey Police, I have had enough.

I have got some savings, which were to be used for my move, but will now be used to sue Surrey Police and specifically,

  1. Nick Ephgrave, Chief Constable of Surrey Police
  2. Detective Inspector Alik James, his assistant
  3. DC Hollie Say 40254
  4. DS Glenn Parker 236
Notice of law suit
David Hender
Wed 16/10/2019 16:48
  • Mr Nick Ephgrave (Chief constable – Surrey Police);
  •  Verity
Dear Chief Constable,
Quite frankly, I have had enough of the impotency and inaction of Surrey Police.
  1. I was told that the matter regarding 236 Glenn Parker and 40254 Hollie Say was supposed to be referred to professional standards but, after the email from your assistant, I heard nothing
  2. Despite me giving significant evidence to the contrary, neither of the above are willing or have been prepared to re-investigate my so called daughter’s false allegations, which had no basis whatsoever
  3. I am disgusted that your assistant came to the conclusion that the offer to bribe letter from my father was merely a “business arrangement”
  4. Your assistant has blocked every single opportunity to access you personally
I will drop the law suit against youyour assistantDC Say and DS Parker on two conditions. They are that
  • My father is arrestedprosecuted and convicted for the the attempt to bribe me
  • My daughter is arrestedprosecuted and convicted for providing false allegations of sexual assault and actual bodily harm
I should advise you that I have been invited by Sky to be interviewed to disclose what has happened to me and, as important, the inaction of the police.
You have less than one week to respond by email
Regards
Featured

I have tried to contact the Chief Constable of Surrey personally

I have tried many times to get through to Nick Ephgrave, the Chief Constable of Surrey Police but every single email has been blocked by his assistant, DI Alik James so I have tried the direct approach.

I doubt that I will get a response because the police cover up for each other but this blog is now very popular and thousands of people read it.

They do not investigate anything. Here is an example. DI James said that those two people from Salfords police station were to be referred to Professional Standards. They never were

So, everyone, around the world, including many UK journalists, will know EXACTLY what the modern Police are like, especially Surrey Police

The Police’s complete disregard of the CRIMES committed against me
This message was sent with High importance.
David Hender
Thu 17/10/2019 10:03
  • nick.ephgrave@redacted
Dear Sir,
I am hoping that this will get to you personally.
I have sent many emails to your assistant, DI Alik James but I expect that these have been blocked by him and have not been passed onto you.
I suggest that you look at these posts, many of which have been copied to Sky News
Featured

Why I am so angry?

My “dear” father wrote to me recently, asking me to go over for a chat and explain as to why I was so angry.

Remember that these are just not my opinions, these come from actual experiences and inactions by various authorities

Mmmmmm let me think:

  • I was fucking falsely accused of sexually abusing my bitch of a daughter
  • I was fucking falsely accused of physically harming my bitch of a daughter
  • Female police officers are as useful as chocolate teapots – they are all bark and no bite
  • Just watch any crime programme; these females just pussy foot around but it is the male thugs who always bring the “criminals” down, normally 6 against 1
  • Most male police officers are thugs; most have shaved heads or ultra short haircuts and fucking look like thugs
  • The police do not treat women as suspicious
  • Customs officers do not treat women as suspicious (I have been stopped and searched but my partner hasn’t)
  • Even when those accusations were proved to be false, they didnt bother in re-interviewing that bitch of a daughter who accused me BECAUSE SHE WAS A GIRL and oh so fucking innocent
  • The Police know that my bitch of a daughter is a pathological liar but they do NOTHING
  • The corrupt Police covered up that they had fucked up
  • Anti social behaviour arrests only seem to relate to men
  • More than half of shop lifters are women but they do not get arrested; it is always the men
  • Advertising agencies seem to think that the only way to sell products is to have women spread across the screens
  • Advertising agencies seem to think that the only way to sell products is to have to denigrate men and treat them in a sexually discriminatory way
  • If you watch crime programmes, you would think that women never commit crimes at all
  • In a crime programme, SIX male officers dragged to the ground a man to handcuff him but he was never charged
  • In a crime programme, a man, who had driven into a brick wall, was arrested before he was even breathalysed
  • In the same programme, his wife came along and did not want to be filmed by the oik cameraman. The twat officer then had the audacity to threaten her with arrest, because she complained
  • In crime programmes, you never see the drunken sluts, like my bitch daughter, being arrested for disorder
  • There is so much corruption in every walk of life
  • The police are fucking corrupt
  • The police don’t care if you are innocent, they just want their “gold stars” and, of course, the fines
  • Women get lighter sentences for the same crime as a man
  • The justice system is corrupt; they don’t care if you are innocent because they will always get their massive fees
  • Barristers should be renamed the “COSY SOCIAL CLUB
  • Reported my father to CHIEF CONSTABLE of Surrey Police for BRIBERY, WITH EVIDENCE OF THE BRIBERY LETTER. They said it was a FUCKING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENT. If that is not bribery, what is?https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/303
  • My father has tried to shaft me financially with the help of BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER and PAICOLEX TRUST MANAGEMENT AG
  • People who have lost their loved ones in a crash would never normally appear on a programme and relive the ordeal. Those interviewed are all yanks and they do it for money.
  • Male prisoners caught abroad for drugs or whatever are left to rot but everything is done to bring the little girlies back and they get far more media coverage
  • When these toe rags get back, they sell their stories and it is all written as though they were the victims
  • So called celebrities would sell their grandmothers for money; all of the famous actresses especially, such as Dame Helen Mirren, selling muck that doesn’t work and then do a bit of acting
  • Stop search seize episode 11. Two passengers, man and woman flying on cloned cards. She sad that she had booked all flights on her card. 95% of the scene was with the man being grilled. Never arrested but sent back. If it has been two men, both would have been arrested. Need I say more
  • Car full of women in Police ten 7, classified as boy racers, assuming that car louts are all men
  • Woman found drunk in drive. Helped home by police. Boyfriend answers door. Asked by police if he had been drinking; so it is illegal to drink in own home now? If it had been a drunk man found, he would have been instantly arrested
  • Women get let off by Police; men do not
  • Woman found in a crashed car. She had been feeding baby on the fly. Normal acting hysterical behaviour. Found guilty and got a fine but no points for careless driving
  • Narrator of Road Wars say that boys want to get on mopeds. So do women, my first wife did. Gross sex discrimination
  • Road Wars is the same programme that films the short haired or shaved headed thug police
  • Road Wars concentrates on 99% of men
  • Road Wars S5 EP 7 – man does not want to be filmed. Officer 1745 , SIMON HILLS, said he does not care. GROSS BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY POLICE, AGAIN
  • THIS IS THE MENTALITY OF THE POLICE 
  • DVLA allows me father to drive and police are not interested. HE HAS ALZHEIMER’S
  • How much of these crime programmes, relating to women, end up on cutting room floor; miles I suspect. Because men are an easy target
  • Boom boxes in cars. These systems send out music so loud that it will break eardrums but the Police do nothing. What is more distracting to a driver? Holding a phone or music running at 100 decibels
  • Get these poofters on Sky Bingo adverts off the screens. I am not a homophobe
  • Road Wars – according to officer, DO NOT do presentation in 7 days, ALL DONE at roadside. a bull faced lie
  • Brit cops law and disorder – Caught short – where are there loos in London?
  • Brit cops law and disorder 100% all to do with men. So there are no female shoplifters then?
  • Brit cops law and disorder – Man on crutches picked up a watch. with a woman. he was arrested for attempted theft. Store found watch in another department. No charges. Blatant discrimination against men
  • It goes on and on. There will be more, much more
  • Brit cops law and disorder. Because a man does not have ID on him, he is arrested for driving  a French plated car
  • THIS IS WHY I HATE LONDON. ANY MAN CAN BE PICKED UP BY THE POLICE, WE ARE ALL FAIR GAME
  • Four men arrested for assault and shoplifting.Two were totally innocent but arrested anyway
  • Two drunken women with two men in a taxi. Women would not pay. BUT the two men arrested. Police takes woman to cash point. Nothing happens to the women
  • For being WRONGLY accused of careless driving. This is a bit complicated so will be linked to another post that I wrote, https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/5670. I was watching a Police programme in New Zealand where a lorry driver had an epileptic fit and the Police decided that it was a no fault accident. But thanks to the Police’s brainless attitude and the arrogance of the anal magistrate, together with being sent to the wrong part of the court in the first place, they wore me down so much with their stupidity, I gave up and pleaded guilty; even though
  1. I had a letter from an expert neurologist, who I had been with for over fifteen years saying that one of my drugs had failed
  2. I had a multitude of tests following the accident with my neurologist, which determined that a drug had failed
  3. I had surrendered my licence as a result
  4. Did not drive again until re-approved by the DVLA
  5. If I had taken that stupid driver awareness course and broken the law as a result, NONE of this would have happened
  6. It cost me £650, six points and a criminal record
  • Road Wars S5 EP 9 – Officer 1745 , SIMON HILLS, (AGAIN) says to a driver that the “whole point of a Danish driving licence is that you carry it with you at all times“. He just makes it up as he goes along
  • Lee Boardman, the narrator of Road Wars is an absolutely arsehole, demeaning men just for money
  • Brit Cops law and disorder – put pretty women officers on the screen at every opportunity
  • How many police does it take to change a light bulb? As many as you like because tax payers pay for them
  • Four officers to arrest a slight black woman – racist
  • Same woman refusing to be searched – so yet another officer runs off to sort it out. That is now FIVE officers
  • Another black woman acting “suspiciously”. She is fed up with being targeted by the white police
  • Even though there is no evidence to arrest the other woman, she is fucking arrested
  • To not be arrested in London for nothing at all – Don’t be black, be white and blonde and BE A WOMAN
  • Do male police like to throw men to the floor in a brutal way? Oh and it has to be at least two police
  • Manhunt for suspected burglars. So women cannot be burglars?
  • Those black women that I mentioned earlier? Nothing mentioned
  • Male police officers must say to their wives “STAND BY THE BED
  • More and more of law & disorder, they focus on 100% of men
  • Police around the world do not understand the idea of RESPECT apart from maybe the Kiwis and Aussies
  • Apparently, according to Law and disorder1 in 5 women will be assaulted during their lives. If that was the case, they would never leave the house
  • Neither woman or boyfriend can identify person. Man is arrested for SEXUAL ASSAULT. If you breathe on a woman, you will get arrested for that or even get close to her and “invade her personal space
  • If you go out for a drink and then get a cab back, you may be loud. If you get an ugly mug of an officer being shoved through a window shouting the odds, of course you are going to get pissed off or aggressive in Police parlance. Why not just get in a car and get pissed. Oh then you will be caught for drink driving.
  • If the above was a load of drunken bimbos, nothing would have happened.
  • Boeing have MURDERED people through KNOWN faulty designs but the NTSB, the US FAA and the US Government let them get away with it
  • Air Crash Investigation is just mere propaganda to let off Boeing, other Yank manufacturers and yank airlines and to denigrate Airbus and the rest
  • A car will be pulled over for being loud  or not be allowed on road after an MOT but have you heard those prats on motorbikes with their sports exhausts thinking they are Barry Sheene. Every bloody sunday at my last house, ruining my day. Police did nothing of course
  • Woman breaks down on motorway after running out of fuel. It is illegal to run a car with no fuel on a motorway. Of course nothing happens to her
  • Police around the world act merely as tax collectors and pick soft targets ie men
  • Adverts are predominantly voiced over my women – so much for an equal society
  • A female truck driver would never be pulled over, always men
  • Are you known to the Police” means “are you male and have we picked on you before
  • Woman who gets stopped has an illegal vehicle; gets let off by a woman officer; surprise, surprise
  • Another woman with an illegal vehicle. Officer lets her off most of fines and escorts her to scrap yard; oh come on
  • Charity adverts showing just girls just goes into a big pot and spent as directed by overpaid executives
  • Any customs dog will just smell food as well as what he is trained to look for. That is what dogs do, all dogs
  • Women customs officers just look at screens; they do no heavy work – oh bless them
  • Women customs officers will not “randomly” stop women, especially when they have children
  • Customs officer swore blind that the dog indicated drugs or money – nothing found
  • Woman customs officer convinced that a man was taking drugs and had drugs on him. Nothing found after, you bet, a strip search
  • Customs officers have targets to meet so they go for soft targets
  • Police officers have targets so they go for soft targets
  • Irish customs officer says you have to prove where fuel came from and have a receipt. It is just pure intimidation
  • Customs and Police officers are like little Hitlers; they pick up people who will get easily intimidated as they have too much power
  • Catch up television equals repeats
  • Customs officer asks passenger where from – passenger tells him 4 times. is he fucking deaf ? Stop search seize – s1 ep 12. Officer aggressive. Surprise surprise, free to go after taking everything out of his bags
  • Police ten 7all of filming directed at male so called criminals. If there was a woman involved, which was just once, let off of course. On alcohol “random” tests, only men tested
  • It goes on and on, doesn’t it. Not surprising that people think girlies are sugar and spice and all things nice – it is pure brainwashing
  • On Police ten 7, all of arrests of women are left on cutting room floor
  • kids knocking off wing mirrors – officer says where are these guys?
  • I repeat what I saidmen and lads are considered by Police to be fair game, women and girls of course just stay at home and wash their hair
  • Lad accused of assault and all of family back up father. BUT family refuse to give evidence in court. That sounds VERY familiar. THE FAMILY WAS LYING AND THE LAD WAS TELLING THE TRUTH
  • Do you know the trauma that is caused when someone who is wrongly accused of awful crimes is thrown in a cell? I DO.When that person is found innocent, the Police do fuck all
  • You listen carefully. ALL of the Police talk about “him” or “guys
  • Even though it was a girl,driving dangerously, the comms officer says it is a guy. AND THE TEARS START TO FLOW. Demands a lawyer BEFORE a breath test. WHAT A GREAT ACTRESS, just like all of the others. Clear the officer is treating her with kid gloves. Police ten 7 series 11 ep 2. Even though she nearly wiped out 5 cars and was drunk, all she got was a  $300 dollar fine and suspended from driving for 6 months. If that had been a chap, he would have lost his licence and be fined. Officer said that “at least you were not crying like the chap a moment ago“. How fucking disgusting but that says it all
  • Paicolex Trust Management AG and Berwin Leighton Paisner have illegally conspired with my father to stuff me financially
  • Paicolex Trust Management AG and Berwin Leighton Paisner have illegally conspired with my father to give millions extra to my brother; we are supposed to be equal in the eyes of the trust
  • The chief constable of Surrey Police (new and old) is disinterested in writing the wrongs done to me by his staff. He is ultimately responsible for every officer in Surrey
  • Stop search seize S1 ep 13 – Plane from Mexico had to be diverted – only people stopped were men. I despise drugs, it ruins people. A used grinder found with NO  drugs plus an empty bag used for cannabis but still seized; they make it up as they go along. No evidence, no drugs but still seized
  • A “person stands out from the crowd“; guess what? a man. One check on bag for 6 weeks; have they not heard of a fucking washing machine? He was Chinese and had lived in Ireland for 30 years; officer asked why he didn’t speak English. There are plenty of people in England who cannot speak English at all and they have been here all there lives. Let him go. Persecution and SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION
  • The BIG difference between programmes such as Stop, Search, Seize and yank/Canadian programmes is that time after time, the Irish find nothing but in the yank/Canadian versions, they use plenty of plants and actors. You can tell that because their faces are shown; which is illegal in any country unless given permission.
  • Even in the atrocious air crash investigation, you have women actors denigrating men
  • You may think I hate women but I love them; I have had had two wives, one magical partner, a number of girlfriends and a daughter whom I used to love
  • Couple stopped in street for supposed shoplifting. Both searched but only he was arrested because of a Christmas cracker set of little screwdrivers in his bag. For goodness sake, they just make it up and do whatever they want. Of course he was released without charge but should not have been arrested in the first place. It is the thuggery mindset of the Police
  • Time and time again the police defend innocent people being filmed without permission
  • Law and disorder – they just basically just film men in trouble; what about all of the drunk bimbos?
  • Even on a programme that I like, Ice Road Rescue, they jump on helping a woman truck driver, when there is a man in front of her and a male behind her, because she is pretty and is female. She didn’t even have snow chains on, unlike the others
  • we will see if he is fit to drive” So said the constable when pulling someone over in NZ. Wherever you go, it is the police’s assumption that men are always at fault. Oh and it was a drunk women. See what I mean?
  • If any driver cannot change a tyre, they should not be on the road. I had to drive a 6 mile round trip to change a female friend’s tyre. Lots of fun and games on the NZ show. If it had been a man, would the WPC have stopped; of course not
  • Every search on stop search seize , bar one, was to do with men
  • Woman beats up partner; police threaten to take the children forcing man to not press charges. A man cannot win, can he?
  • Woman insults man. he ignores and she walks off with her chaps. They return and then a chap punches him in the face. Guess what, man is arrested but the girl who started it all gets away scot free. If she had never said anything, nothing would have happened
  • It does not matter what country it is, men are always targeted and get arrested; women on the other hand, are not targeted and are just sugar and spice
  • There is so much of this everywhere, I could literally do this full time
  • Known troublemaker” kicked in a phone box and booted a car. He got 2 months in prison and a fine. But drivers who are pissed out of their skull just get points and a fine; who is more dangerous?
  • I dont know what the law is in NZ with regard to trespass, but in the UK it is not a crime. Of course the complainant was a woman. Just checked the net. You have to give them a trespass notice and if they do not comply with the notice, only then can the police be called. So the police did not apply the law and just arrested the man
  • A shed was stopped. It was a woman driver. So, she and her male passenger were excused the fines.
  • None of this is coincidence. If a woman is involved, the police go “ahhh” and then focus on the man, any man
  • If a woman is accused of anything, she is always referred to by her first name but, if it is a man, it is always the surname
  • With everything that I have written above, are you surprised that I cut myself off from society
  • Four men stopped by customs. couldn’t speak a word of English. Officer thought they were lying. Nothing found off course
  • You know what I said about WPCs being chocolate teapots; well just seen a clip when a wpc and a male officer were chasing after someone and she ushered the male officer in front of her; all they are good at is driving around around in cars and shuffling around after an incident has occurred
  • Yet another law and disorder where there was a bus with two drunk men on board. Always being told to not drink and drive so you cannot win at all
  • A woman accused of assault. Spotted and arrested but of course not cuffed and just walked to the car compare with a man arrested for shoplifting one bottle of wine. Of course, he was cuffed

I have sent the link to this post to The Chief Constable of Surrey Police, Nick Ephgrave ( Have now found out he has been replaced by Gavin Stephens) but this will be blocked too.

I have sent numerous complaints to the Chief Constable of Surrey Police but they have always been blocked by his assistant, DI Alik James. Here is his response to my blackmail complaint and other complaints. 

RE: My last email- Disgusted
You replied on Wed 13/06/2018 14:19
!Surrey Chief Constable (Surrey) <SurreyChiefConstable@surrey.pnn.police.uk>
Wed 13/06/2018 12:03
  • You

Dear Mr Hender,

Thank you for your email and for taking the time to expand upon your concerns.

I see that there are two issues here, the first being a complaint about the police conduct and the second being allegations against your father of attempted bribery, fraud and tax evasion.

With regards to the first issue of police conduct, I will forward your email to our Professional Standards Department for their review. A member of their team will be in contact with you in due course.

On the second issue, the allegations, I will start with the tax evasion. You can report someone to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) if you think that they are evading tax. You can do this by completing an online form or calling the HMRC fraud hotline on 0800 788 887. Here is a link to the website https://www.gov.uk/browse/justice/reporting-crimes-compensation. Here you can find out more about reporting tax evasion or making complaints about a limited company.

In respect of the bribery, or attempted bribery, you have still not provided any information to suggest you have been, or attempted to be, bribed to perform one of the relevant functions or activities set out in the Bribery Act 2010. Returning shares, selling your home and removing your posts do not constitute any improper performance of a relevant function or activity you must undertake. You have not provided information to suggest, that on the balance of probabilities, you have been bribed or an attempt has been made to bribe you. (it does if he offers to pay you £250,000)

Moving on to the fraud you propose, you have not provided information to suggest that on the balance of probabilities a criminal offence has been committed or that an attempt is being made to commit one. Your fathers letter states his proposal to give you £250,000 if you agree to the conditions. Subsequent to which he proposes that a legal agreement would be drawn up. This appears to me to be a transparent proposal, which seeks your agreement and with there being subsequent legal oversight. In short, it could not be argued that this is a dishonest attempt to obtain these shares from you. In respect of your being refused copies of accounts, this is not a policing matter, it is a civil one.

In conclusion, I shall forward this email to our professional standards department for their review and response to your complaints. I shall not take any further action with regards to the allegations of bribery, fraud and tax evasion you make against your father.

I recognise this is not the news you would wish to receive and acknowledge you may believe my knowledge of the law to be inadequate and the police are lazy, ineffectual and impotent. If you wish to make a complaint about me or my review of the circumstances as they have been presented to me, you can contact our professional standards department using the methods outlined on our website at: https://www.surrey.police.uk/contact-us/make-a-complaint-or-give-feedback/.

Yours sincerely,

Alick

DI Alick James

Staff Officer to the Chief Constable

Surrey Police

Oh I NEVER HEARD from Professional Standards

 

I have absolutely no respect for the Police and if they asked for my assistance to find a criminal, I would not help them. GUESS WHAT, I WOULD BE ARRESTED ALTHOUGH IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTHING TO DO WITH ME

I will bring down:

  • That bitch of a daughter
  • Her mother

Both of whom are psychopaths.

I have no love for that bitch

I will bring down:

  • My father for fucking me up
  • DC 440254 Hollie Say
  • DC 236 Glenn Parker

I will bring down:

  • My father for tax evasion
  • My so called brother for tax evasion
  • That bitch of a daughter for stitching me up
  • That bitch of a first wife for stitching me up for all of Verity’s life

 

Oh and do not buy a smart meter; they are a complete con. I refuse to have one

Featured

Naming and shaming Surrey Police(UPDATED)

UPDATE

As part of my premium service, not only can I see the numbers of hits on my blog but also what they are looking at. Even though it is just 8.40 in the morning, people have got very interested in this post and the number of hits is going through the roof. So many people will now know what I think of the Police and why

You all know the story and the Police’s disinterest in doing anything about what had happened to me.

Why am I naming and shaming certain individuals? Because

  • They did not re-investigate my daughter when her allegations were proved to be false
  • They breached my human rights by making the DVD of the horrendous interrogation DISAPPEAR
  • They ignored my accusation, with proof, about my father’s bribery
  • They were disinterested in my fraud and tax evasion allegations, which are crimes and just tried to pass the buck to other agencies
  • Although the behaviour of the two DCs was supposed to be referred to the Professional Standards section of the Police, NOTHING was done and I received no communications from them. I doubt that my complaint was even sent to them

The culprits are as follows:

  • Detective Inspector Alik James, Staff officer to Nick Ephgrave, Chief Constable of Surrey Police
  • Nick Ephgrave, Chief Constable of Surrey Police
  • Detective Constable 40254 Hollie Say of Salfords (Redhill) Police
  • Detective Constable 236 Glenn Parker of Salfords (Redhill) Police

WordPress will not let me put email or work addresses on here but if you contact me via my contact page with your email addresses, I will forward them to you

For the reaction from the Police, in an attempt to gag me, look at https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/6503

 

I have put a “sticky” on this post, so that it is the very first post that everyone will see.

 

Featured

Naming and shaming Surrey Police

THIS POST IS GAINING SERIOUS TRACTION WITH ALL OF MY VISITORS TO MY BLOG

You all know the many stories of what has been going on in my life and the Police’s COMPLETE disinterest in doing anything about what had happened to me.

Why am I naming and shaming certain individuals? Because…..

  • They did not re-investigate my daughter when her allegations were proved to be false
  • They breached my human rights by making the DVD of the horrendous interrogation DISAPPEAR
  • They ignored my accusation, complete with proof, about my father’s bribery
  • They were disinterested in my fraud and tax evasion allegations, which are crimes and just tried to pass the buck to other agencies
  • Although the behaviour of the two DCs was supposed to be referred to the Professional Standards section of the Police, NOTHING was done and I received no communications from them. I doubt that my complaint was even sent to them

The culprits are as follows:

  • Detective Inspector Alik James, Staff officer to Nick Ephgrave, Chief Constable of Surrey Police
  • Nick Ephgrave, Chief Constable of Surrey Police
  • Detective Constable 40254 Hollie Say of Salfords (Redhill) Police
  • Detective Constable 236 Glenn Parker of Salfords (Redhill) Police

WordPress will not let me put email or work addresses on here but if you contact me via my contact page with your email addresses, I will forward them to you

For the reaction from the Police, in an attempt to gag me, look at https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/6503

I have put a “sticky” on this post, so that it is the very first post that everyone will see.

Featured

Why I am so angry

My “dear” father wrote to me recently, asking me to go over for a chat and explain as to why I was so angry.

Remember that these are just not my opinions, these come from actual experiences

Mmmmmm let me think:

  • I was fucking falsely accused of sexually abusing my bitch of a daughter
  • I was fucking falsely accused of physically harming my bitch of a daughter
  • Female police officers are as useful as chocolate teapots – they are all bark and no bite
  • Just watch any crime programme; these females just pussy foot around but it is the male thugs who always bring the “criminals” down, normally 6 against 1
  • Most male police officers are thugs; most have shaved heads or ultra short haircuts and fucking look like thugs
  • The police do not treat women as suspicious
  • Customs officers do not treat women as suspicious (I have been stopped and searched but my partner hasn’t)
  • Even when those accusations were proved to be false, they didnt bother in re-interviewing that bitch of a daughter who accused me BECAUSE SHE WAS A GIRL and oh so fucking innocent
  • The Police know that my bitch of a daughter is a pathological liar but they do NOTHING
  • The corrupt Police covered up that they had fucked up
  • Anti social behaviour arrests only seem to relate to men
  • More than half of shop lifters are women but they do not get arrested; it is always the men
  • Advertising agencies seem to think that the only way to sell products is to have women spread across the screens
  • Advertising agencies seem to think that the only way to sell products is to have to denigrate men and treat them in a sexually discriminatory way
  • If you watch crime programmes, you would think that women never commit crimes at all
  • In a crime programme, SIX male officers dragged to the ground a man to handcuff him but he was never charged
  • In a crime programme, a man, who had driven into a brick wall, was arrested before he was even breathalysed
  • In the same programme, his wife came along and did not want to be filmed by the oik cameraman. The twat officer then had the audacity to threaten her with arrest, because she complained
  • In crime programmes, you never see the drunken sluts, like my bitch daughter, being arrested for disorder
  • There is so much corruption in every walk of life
  • The police are fucking corrupt
  • The police don’t care if you are innocent, they just want their “gold stars” and, of course, the fines
  • Women get lighter sentences for the same crime as a man
  • The justice system is corrupt; they don’t care if you are innocent because they will always get their massive fees
  • Barristers should be renamed the “COSY SOCIAL CLUB
  • Reported my father to CHIEF CONSTABLE of Surrey Police for BRIBERY, WITH EVIDENCE OF THE BRIBERY LETTER. They said it was a FUCKING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENT. If that is not bribery, what is?https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/303
  • My father has tried to shaft me financially with the help of BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER and PAICOLEX TRUST MANAGEMENT AG
  • People who have lost their loved ones in a crash would never normally appear on a programme and relive the ordeal. Those interviewed are all yanks and they do it for money.
  • Male prisoners caught abroad for drugs or whatever are left to rot but everything is done to bring the little girlies back and they get far more media coverage
  • When these toe rags get back, they sell their stories and it is all written as though they were the victims
  • So called celebrities would sell their grandmothers for money; all of the famous actresses especially, such as Dame Helen Mirren, selling muck that doesn’t work and then do a bit of acting
  • Stop search seize episode 11. Two passengers, man and woman flying on cloned cards. She sad that she had booked all flights on her card. 95% of the scene was with the man being grilled. Never arrested but sent back. If it has been two men, both would have been arrested. Need I say more
  • Car full of women in Police ten 7, classified as boy racers, assuming that car louts are all men
  • Woman found drunk in drive. Helped home by police. Boyfriend answers door. Asked by police if he had been drinking; so it is illegal to drink in own home now? If it had been a drunk man found, he would have been instantly arrested
  • Women get let off by Police; men do not
  • Woman found in a crashed car. She had been feeding baby on the fly. Normal acting hysterical behaviour. Found guilty and got a fine but no points for careless driving
  • Narrator of Road Wars say that boys want to get on mopeds. So do women, my first wife did. Gross sex discrimination
  • Road Wars is the same programme that films the short haired or shaved headed thug police
  • Road Wars concentrates on 99% of men
  • Road Wars S5 EP 7 – man does not want to be filmed. Officer 1745 , SIMON HILLS, said he does not care. GROSS BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY POLICE, AGAIN
  • THIS IS THE MENTALITY OF THE POLICE 
  • DVLA allows me father to drive and police are not interested. HE HAS ALZHEIMER’S
  • How much of these crime programmes, relating to women, end up on cutting room floor; miles I suspect. Because men are an easy target
  • Boom boxes in cars. These systems send out music so loud that it will break eardrums but the Police do nothing. What is more distracting to a driver? Holding a phone or music running at 100 decibels
  • Get these poofters on Sky Bingo adverts off the screens. I am not a homophobe
  • Road Wars – according to officer, DO NOT do presentation in 7 days, ALL DONE at roadside. a bull faced lie
  • Brit cops law and disorder – Caught short – where are there loos in London?
  • Brit cops law and disorder 100% all to do with men. So there are no female shoplifters then?
  • Brit cops law and disorder – Man on crutches picked up a watch. with a woman. he was arrested for attempted theft. Store found watch in another department. No charges. Blatant discrimination against men
  • It goes on and on. There will be more, much more
  • Brit cops law and disorder. Because a man does not have ID on him, he is arrested for driving  a French plated car
  • THIS IS WHY I HATE LONDON. ANY MAN CAN BE PICKED UP BY THE POLICE, WE ARE ALL FAIR GAME
  • Four men arrested for assault and shoplifting.Two were totally innocent but arrested anyway
  • Two drunken women with two men in a taxi. Women would not pay. BUT the two men arrested. Police takes woman to cash point. Nothing happens to the women
  • For being WRONGLY accused of careless driving. This is a bit complicated so will be linked to another post that I wrote, https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/5670. I was watching a Police programme in New Zealand where a lorry driver had an epileptic fit and the Police decided that it was a no fault accident. But thanks to the Police’s brainless attitude and the arrogance of the anal magistrate, together with being sent to the wrong part of the court in the first place, they wore me down so much with their stupidity, I gave up and pleaded guilty; even though
  1. I had a letter from an expert neurologist, who I had been with for over fifteen years saying that one of my drugs had failed
  2. I had a multitude of tests following the accident with my neurologist, which determined that a drug had failed
  3. I had surrendered my licence as a result
  4. Did not drive again until re-approved by the DVLA
  5. If I had taken that stupid driver awareness course and broken the law as a result, NONE of this would have happened
  6. It cost me £650, six points and a criminal record
  • Road Wars S5 EP 9 – Officer 1745 , SIMON HILLS, (AGAIN) says to a driver that the “whole point of a Danish driving licence is that you carry it with you at all times“. He just makes it up as he goes along
  • Lee Boardman, the narrator of Road Wars is an absolutely arsehole, demeaning men just for money
  • Brit Cops law and disorder – put pretty women officers on the screen at every opportunity
  • How many police does it take to change a light bulb? As many as you like because tax payers pay for them
  • Four officers to arrest a slight black woman – racist
  • Same woman refusing to be searched – so yet another officer runs off to sort it out. That is now FIVE officers
  • Another black woman acting “suspiciously”. She is fed up with being targeted by the white police
  • Even though there is no evidence to arrest the other woman, she is fucking arrested
  • To not be arrested in London for nothing at all – Don’t be black, be white and blonde and BE A WOMAN
  • Do male police like to throw men to the floor in a brutal way? Oh and it has to be at least two police
  • Manhunt for suspected burglars. So women cannot be burglars?
  • Those black women that I mentioned earlier? Nothing mentioned
  • Male police officers must say to their wives “STAND BY THE BED
  • More and more of law & disorder, they focus on 100% of men
  • Police around the world do not understand the idea of RESPECT apart from maybe the Kiwis and Aussies
  • Apparently, according to Law and disorder1 in 5 women will be assaulted during their lives. If that was the case, they would never leave the house
  • Neither woman or boyfriend can identify person. Man is arrested for SEXUAL ASSAULT. If you breathe on a woman, you will get arrested for that or even get close to her and “invade her personal space
  • If you go out for a drink and then get a cab back, you may be loud. If you get an ugly mug of an officer being shoved through a window shouting the odds, of course you are going to get pissed off or aggressive in Police parlance. Why not just get in a car and get pissed. Oh then you will be caught for drink driving.
  • If the above was a load of drunken bimbos, nothing would have happened.
  • Boeing have MURDERED people through KNOWN faulty designs but the NTSB, the US FAA and the US Government let them get away with it
  • Air Crash Investigation is just mere propaganda to let off Boeing, other Yank manufacturers and yank airlines and to denigrate Airbus and the rest
  • A car will be pulled over for being loud  or not be allowed on road after an MOT but have you heard those prats on motorbikes with their sports exhausts thinking they are Barry Sheene. Every bloody sunday at my last house, ruining my day. Police did nothing of course
  • Woman breaks down on motorway after running out of fuel. It is illegal to run a car with no fuel on a motorway. Of course nothing happens to her
  • Police around the world act merely as tax collectors and pick soft targets ie men
  • Adverts are predominantly voiced over my women – so much for an equal society
  • A female truck driver would never be pulled over, always men
  • Are you known to the Police” means “are you male and have we picked on you before
  • Woman who gets stopped has an illegal vehicle; gets let off by a woman officer; surprise, surprise
  • Another woman with an illegal vehicle. Officer lets her off most of fines and escorts her to scrap yard; oh come on
  • Charity adverts showing just girls just goes into a big pot and spent as directed by overpaid executives
  • Any customs dog will just smell food as well as what he is trained to look for. That is what dogs do, all dogs
  • Women customs officers just look at screens; they do no heavy work – oh bless them
  • Women customs officers will not “randomly” stop women, especially when they have children
  • Customs officer swore blind that the dog indicated drugs or money – nothing found
  • Woman customs officer convinced that a man was taking drugs and had drugs on him. Nothing found after, you bet, a strip search
  • Customs officers have targets to meet so they go for soft targets
  • Police officers have targets so they go for soft targets
  • Irish customs officer says you have to prove where fuel came from and have a receipt. It is just pure intimidation
  • Customs and Police officers are like little Hitlers; they pick up people who will get easily intimidated as they have too much power
  • Catch up television equals repeats
  • Customs officer asks passenger where from – passenger tells him 4 times. is he fucking deaf ? Stop search seize – s1 ep 12. Officer aggressive. Surprise surprise, free to go after taking everything out of his bags
  • Police ten 7all of filming directed at male so called criminals. If there was a woman involved, which was just once, let off of course. On alcohol “random” tests, only men tested
  • It goes on and on, doesn’t it. Not surprising that people think girlies are sugar and spice and all things nice – it is pure brainwashing
  • On Police ten 7, all of arrests of women are left on cutting room floor
  • kids knocking off wing mirrors – officer says where are these guys?
  • I repeat what I saidmen and lads are considered by Police to be fair game, women and girls of course just stay at home and wash their hair
  • Lad accused of assault and all of family back up father. BUT family refuse to give evidence in court. That sounds VERY familiar. THE FAMILY WAS LYING AND THE LAD WAS TELLING THE TRUTH
  • Do you know the trauma that is caused when someone who is wrongly accused of awful crimes is thrown in a cell? I DO.When that person is found innocent, the Police do fuck all
  • You listen carefully. ALL of the Police talk about “him” or “guys
  • Even though it was a girl,driving dangerously, the comms officer says it is a guy. AND THE TEARS START TO FLOW. Demands a lawyer BEFORE a breath test. WHAT A GREAT ACTRESS, just like all of the others. Clear the officer is treating her with kid gloves. Police ten 7 series 11 ep 2. Even though she nearly wiped out 5 cars and was drunk, all she got was a  $300 dollar fine and suspended from driving for 6 months. If that had been a chap, he would have lost his licence and be fined. Officer said that “at least you were not crying like the chap a moment ago“. How fucking disgusting but that says it all

I have sent the link to this post to The Chief Constable of Surrey Police, Nick Ephgrave but this will be blocked too.

I have sent numerous complaints to the Chief Constable of Surrey Police but they have always been blocked by his assistant, DI Alik James. Here is his response to my blackmail complaint and other complaints. 

RE: My last email- Disgusted
You replied on Wed 13/06/2018 14:19
!Surrey Chief Constable (Surrey) <SurreyChiefConstable@surrey.pnn.police.uk>
Wed 13/06/2018 12:03
  • You

Dear Mr Hender,

Thank you for your email and for taking the time to expand upon your concerns.

I see that there are two issues here, the first being a complaint about the police conduct and the second being allegations against your father of attempted bribery, fraud and tax evasion.

With regards to the first issue of police conduct, I will forward your email to our Professional Standards Department for their review. A member of their team will be in contact with you in due course.

On the second issue, the allegations, I will start with the tax evasion. You can report someone to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) if you think that they are evading tax. You can do this by completing an online form or calling the HMRC fraud hotline on 0800 788 887. Here is a link to the website https://www.gov.uk/browse/justice/reporting-crimes-compensation. Here you can find out more about reporting tax evasion or making complaints about a limited company.

In respect of the bribery, or attempted bribery, you have still not provided any information to suggest you have been, or attempted to be, bribed to perform one of the relevant functions or activities set out in the Bribery Act 2010. Returning shares, selling your home and removing your posts do not constitute any improper performance of a relevant function or activity you must undertake. You have not provided information to suggest, that on the balance of probabilities, you have been bribed or an attempt has been made to bribe you. (it does if he offers to pay you £250,000)

Moving on to the fraud you propose, you have not provided information to suggest that on the balance of probabilities a criminal offence has been committed or that an attempt is being made to commit one. Your fathers letter states his proposal to give you £250,000 if you agree to the conditions. Subsequent to which he proposes that a legal agreement would be drawn up. This appears to me to be a transparent proposal, which seeks your agreement and with there being subsequent legal oversight. In short, it could not be argued that this is a dishonest attempt to obtain these shares from you. In respect of your being refused copies of accounts, this is not a policing matter, it is a civil one.

In conclusion, I shall forward this email to our professional standards department for their review and response to your complaints. I shall not take any further action with regards to the allegations of bribery, fraud and tax evasion you make against your father.

I recognise this is not the news you would wish to receive and acknowledge you may believe my knowledge of the law to be inadequate and the police are lazy, ineffectual and impotent. If you wish to make a complaint about me or my review of the circumstances as they have been presented to me, you can contact our professional standards department using the methods outlined on our website at: https://www.surrey.police.uk/contact-us/make-a-complaint-or-give-feedback/.

Yours sincerely,

Alick

DI Alick James

Staff Officer to the Chief Constable

Surrey Police

Oh I NEVER HEARD from Professional Standards

 

I have absolutely no respect for the Police and if they asked for my assistance to find a criminal, I would not help them. GUESS WHAT, I WOULD BE ARRESTED ALTHOUGH IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTHING TO DO WITH ME

I will bring down:

  • That bitch of a daughter
  • Her mother

Both of whom are psychopaths.

I have no love for that bitch

I will bring down:

  • My father for fucking me up
  • DC 440254 Hollie Say
  • DC 236 Glenn Parker

I will bring down:

  • My father for tax evasion
  • My so called brother for tax evasion
  • That bitch of a daughter for stitching me up
  • That bitch of a first wife for stitching me up for all of Verity’s life

 

Oh and do not buy a smart meter; they are a complete con. I refuse to have one

Featured

Why I am so angry

My “dear” father wrote to me recently, asking me to go over for a chat and explain as to why I was so angry.

Remember that these are just not my opinions, these come from actual experiences

Mmmmmm let me think:

  • I was fucking falsely accused of sexually abusing my bitch of a daughter
  • I was fucking falsely accused of physically harming my bitch of a daughter
  • Female police officers are as useful as chocolate teapots – they are all bark and no bite
  • Just watch any crime programme; these females just pussy foot around but it is the male thugs who always bring the “criminals” down, normally 6 against 1
  • Most male police officers are thugs; most have shaved heads or ultra short haircuts and fucking look like thugs
  • The police do not treat women as suspicious
  • Customs officers do not treat women as suspicious (I have been stopped and searched but my partner hasn’t)
  • Even when those accusations were proved to be false, they didnt bother in re-interviewing that bitch of a daughter who accused me BECAUSE SHE WAS A GIRL and oh so fucking innocent
  • The Police know that my bitch of a daughter is a pathological liar but they do NOTHING
  • The corrupt Police covered up that they had fucked up
  • Anti social behaviour arrests only seem to relate to men
  • More than half of shop lifters are women but they do not get arrested; it is always the men
  • Advertising agencies seem to think that the only way to sell products is to have women spread across the screens
  • Advertising agencies seem to think that the only way to sell products is to have to denigrate men and treat them in a sexually discriminatory way
  • If you watch crime programmes, you would think that women never commit crimes at all
  • In a crime programme, SIX male officers dragged to the ground a man to handcuff him but he was never charged
  • In a crime programme, a man, who had driven into a brick wall, was arrested before he was even breathalysed
  • In the same programme, his wife came along and did not want to be filmed by the oik cameraman. The twat officer then had the audacity to threaten her with arrest, because she complained
  • In crime programmes, you never see the drunken sluts, like my bitch daughter, being arrested for disorder
  • There is so much corruption in every walk of life
  • The police are fucking corrupt
  • The police don’t care if you are innocent, they just want their “gold stars” and, of course, the fines
  • Women get lighter sentences for the same crime as a man
  • The justice system is corrupt; they don’t care if you are innocent because they will always get their massive fees
  • Barristers should be renamed the “COSY SOCIAL CLUB
  • Reported my father to CHIEF CONSTABLE of Surrey Police for BRIBERY, WITH EVIDENCE OF THE BRIBERY LETTER. They said it was a FUCKING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENT. If that is not bribery, what is?https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/303
  • My father has tried to shaft me financially with the help of BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER and PAICOLEX TRUST MANAGEMENT AG
  • People who have lost their loved ones in a crash would never normally appear on a programme and relive the ordeal. Those interviewed are all yanks and they do it for money.
  • Male prisoners caught abroad for drugs or whatever are left to rot but everything is done to bring the little girlies back and they get far more media coverage
  • When these toe rags get back, they sell their stories and it is all written as though they were the victims
  • So called celebrities would sell their grandmothers for money; all of the famous actresses especially, such as Dame Helen Mirren, selling muck that doesn’t work and then do a bit of acting
  • Stop search seize episode 11. Two passengers, man and woman flying on cloned cards. She sad that she had booked all flights on her card. 95% of the scene was with the man being grilled. Never arrested but sent back. If it has been two men, both would have been arrested. Need I say more
  • Car full of women in Police ten 7, classified as boy racers, assuming that car louts are all men
  • Woman found drunk in drive. Helped home by police. Boyfriend answers door. Asked by police if he had been drinking; so it is illegal to drink in own home now? If it had been a drunk man found, he would have been instantly arrested
  • Women get let off by Police; men do not
  • Woman found in a crashed car. She had been feeding baby on the fly. Normal acting hysterical behaviour. Found guilty and got a fine but no points for careless driving
  • Narrator of Road Wars say that boys want to get on mopeds. So do women, my first wife did. Gross sex discrimination
  • Road Wars is the same programme that films the short haired or shaved headed thug police
  • Road Wars concentrates on 99% of men
  • Road Wars S5 EP 7 – man does not want to be filmed. Officer 1745 , SIMON HILLS, said he does not care. GROSS BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY POLICE, AGAIN
  • THIS IS THE MENTALITY OF THE POLICE 
  • DVLA allows me father to drive and police are not interested. HE HAS ALZHEIMER’S
  • How much of these crime programmes, relating to women, end up on cutting room floor; miles I suspect. Because men are an easy target
  • Boom boxes in cars. These systems send out music so loud that it will break eardrums but the Police do nothing. What is more distracting to a driver? Holding a phone or music running at 100 decibels
  • Get these poofters on Sky Bingo adverts off the screens. I am not a homophobe
  • Road Wars – according to officer, DO NOT do presentation in 7 days, ALL DONE at roadside. a bull faced lie
  • Brit cops law and disorder – Caught short – where are there loos in London?
  • Brit cops law and disorder 100% all to do with men. So there are no female shoplifters then?
  • Brit cops law and disorder – Man on crutches picked up a watch. with a woman. he was arrested for attempted theft. Store found watch in another department. No charges. Blatant discrimination against men
  • It goes on and on. There will be more, much more
  • Brit cops law and disorder. Because a man does not have ID on him, he is arrested for driving  a French plated car
  • THIS IS WHY I HATE LONDON. ANY MAN CAN BE PICKED UP BY THE POLICE, WE ARE ALL FAIR GAME
  • Four men arrested for assault and shoplifting.Two were totally innocent but arrested anyway
  • Two drunken women with two men in a taxi. Women would not pay. BUT the two men arrested. Police takes woman to cash point. Nothing happens to the women
  • For being WRONGLY accused of careless driving. This is a bit complicated so will be linked to another post that I wrote, https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/5670. I was watching a Police programme in New Zealand where a lorry driver had an epileptic fit and the Police decided that it was a no fault accident. But thanks to the Police’s brainless attitude and the arrogance of the anal magistrate, together with being sent to the wrong part of the court in the first place, they wore me down so much with their stupidity, I gave up and pleaded guilty; even though
  1. I had a letter from an expert neurologist, who I had been with for over fifteen years saying that one of my drugs had failed
  2. I had a multitude of tests following the accident with my neurologist, which determined that a drug had failed
  3. I had surrendered my licence as a result
  4. Did not drive again until re-approved by the DVLA
  5. If I had taken that stupid driver awareness course and broken the law as a result, NONE of this would have happened

 

I have sent the link to this post to The Chief Constable of Surrey Police, Nick Ephgrave but this will be blocked too.

I have sent numerous complaints to the Chief Constable of Surrey Police but they have always been blocked by his assistant, DI Alik James. Here is his response to my blackmail complaint and other complaints. 

The difference now, of course, is that when I sent that blackmail complaint, my blog had only run for 3 months but now, I have tens of thousands of hits to my site, with visitors from all over the world. SO, EVERYONE WILL NOW KNOW ABOUT THE IMPOTENCY OF SURREY POLICE

RE: My last email- Disgusted
You replied on Wed 13/06/2018 14:19
!Surrey Chief Constable (Surrey) <SurreyChiefConstable@surrey.pnn.police.uk>
Wed 13/06/2018 12:03
  • You

Dear Mr Hender,

Thank you for your email and for taking the time to expand upon your concerns.

I see that there are two issues here, the first being a complaint about the police conduct and the second being allegations against your father of attempted bribery, fraud and tax evasion.

With regards to the first issue of police conduct, I will forward your email to our Professional Standards Department for their review. A member of their team will be in contact with you in due course.

On the second issue, the allegations, I will start with the tax evasion. You can report someone to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) if you think that they are evading tax. You can do this by completing an online form or calling the HMRC fraud hotline on 0800 788 887. Here is a link to the website https://www.gov.uk/browse/justice/reporting-crimes-compensation. Here you can find out more about reporting tax evasion or making complaints about a limited company.

In respect of the bribery, or attempted bribery, you have still not provided any information to suggest you have been, or attempted to be, bribed to perform one of the relevant functions or activities set out in the Bribery Act 2010. Returning shares, selling your home and removing your posts do not constitute any improper performance of a relevant function or activity you must undertake. You have not provided information to suggest, that on the balance of probabilities, you have been bribed or an attempt has been made to bribe you.

Moving on to the fraud you propose, you have not provided information to suggest that on the balance of probabilities a criminal offence has been committed or that an attempt is being made to commit one. Your fathers letter states his proposal to give you £250,000 if you agree to the conditions. Subsequent to which he proposes that a legal agreement would be drawn up. This appears to me to be a transparent proposal, which seeks your agreement and with there being subsequent legal oversight. In short, it could not be argued that this is a dishonest attempt to obtain these shares from you. In respect of your being refused copies of accounts, this is not a policing matter, it is a civil one.

In conclusion, I shall forward this email to our professional standards department for their review and response to your complaints. I shall not take any further action with regards to the allegations of bribery, fraud and tax evasion you make against your father.

I recognise this is not the news you would wish to receive and acknowledge you may believe my knowledge of the law to be inadequate and the police are lazy, ineffectual and impotent. If you wish to make a complaint about me or my review of the circumstances as they have been presented to me, you can contact our professional standards department using the methods outlined on our website at: https://www.surrey.police.uk/contact-us/make-a-complaint-or-give-feedback/.

Yours sincerely,

Alick

DI Alick James

Staff Officer to the Chief Constable

Surrey Police

Oh I NEVER HEARD from Professional Standards

 

I have absolutely no respect for the Police and if they asked for my assistance to find a criminal, I would not help them. GUESS WHAT, I WOULD BE ARRESTED ALTHOUGH IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTHING TO DO WITH ME

I will bring down:

  • That bitch of a daughter
  • Her mother

Both of whom are psychopaths.

I have no love for that bitch

I will bring down:

  • My father for fucking me up
  • DC 440254 Hollie Say
  • DC 236 Glenn Parker

I will bring down:

  • My father for tax evasion
  • My so called brother for tax evasion
  • That bitch of a daughter for stitching me up
  • That bitch of a first wife for stitching me up for all of Verity’s life

 

Oh and do not buy a smart meter; they are a complete con. I refuse to have one

Featured

The new Dove girl campaign (reposted)

Sometimes, I am forced to watch “live” television, as I have not recorded something and the effect of that is that I have to endure the adverts too.

I watched an advert yesterday and I was absolutely godsmacked.

It was the worst female gender biased advert that I have ever come across.

There is a new campaign being peddled by Dove, the soap people. It is designed to get traction from the female community to see (and I quote)

“how women are portrayed in the media and in advertising”

My goodness; what planet are these people on?

Not only do we live in a highly feminised society but it is reflected in just about every advert.

  • Our screens are awash with adverts about beauty aids, perfumes, clothing and everything else to do with women
  • Even non gender specific adverts have actresses and female voice over artists crawling all over them; I have commented on this many times
  • Where there is a man in an advert, he is generally denigrated or made fun of; even if it is a meerkat!

What all of this advertising is designed to do is to get into our psyche and when that happens, it modifies people’s behaviour and attitudes. That is already reflected in divorce and the attitudes of the Police and the justice system to women compared to men.

Women have nothing to fear whatsoever. 

If anyone should be fearful, it is the male gender, as it is constantly being marginalised.

I really hope that this advert/campaign that Dove have thought up will backfire on them and both men and women who, until now, have been passive on the issue, will raise their arms in sheer disgust and will vote with their wallets

Featured

Lisa Mayhew – Managing Partner of Berwin Leighton Paisner – HEAR NO EVIL, SEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL

As you all know, I have sent dozens of emails to Lisa Mayhew, the big honcho, at Berwin Leighton Paisner.

To escape any personal blame, she redirected all of her emails to Gaby Kaiser, Head of Professional Risk, so that she would get any blame and lose her job.

Here is what I wrote before

https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/2050

After I posted the above article, the diversion of emails stopped but now that things are getting very sticky for Berwin Leighton Paisner, the diversion of emails has restarted.

Isn’t that just great for Gaby Kaiser? She is away on holiday and has no knowledge that her boss is diverting emails again and that Lisa Mayhew is dumping her in the s##t again, just so that she can save her own skin.

 

Featured

David’s top 20(ish) of the most demeaning and female gender biased adverts and dramas (and sometimes films) about men. (Re-posted and updated)

This chart, which will be regularly updated and will be kept near the top of all of my posts, as I will apply a “sticky” to it.

Adverts that are “gender related” are excluded, such as for tampons, make up (of which there are so many), Viagra and those for incontinence (although you will never see one for men) Let’s face it, if you scroll through the adverts, you will see more women’s faces as compared to those of men.

  1. Murdoch Mysteries (I have talked at great length about this light hearted drama so please refer to specific posts, of which there are a great deal). The female gender bias and demeaning of men are incessant. In addition, through so called chance meetings with Dr Ogden, she more than occasionally gives ideas to Murdoch that end up solving the crime. HENCE THE NUMBER ONE SPOT, for so many reasons.
  2. Hotel.com (the advert when they are all in the bathroom and the man is on the toilet doing a “number 2”. I don’t think that you can get any lower than that for demeaning a man and yes, you would never see the roles reversed, would you)
  3. Our time over 50s online dating (90% female actresses, 10% male actors, 100% female voice over artists)
  4. Aldi supermarkets (To get around the gender bias issue, they have a “husband and wife” who just happen to be two sapphists. This way, they can ensure that they can get twice as many women into an advert. If challenged, they can argue they are being anti homophobic; a clever but inevitably faulty proposition)
  5. Totally Money.com (for adverts that ask if “he has a big one” or quoting the numbers “6,7 and 8whilst Anthea Turner moves her hands apart implying a question as to how long his member is), if not via double entendres but you would never see that applied to a woman
  6. Woucher (where most of the adverts see three women, prancing around as though they were prostitutes)
  7. Woucher (where men are seen prancing around looking like sheer dickheads)
  8. KFC (using only women with so called hip London accents)
  9. Boots (where their adverts are mainly directed at women)
  10. Cancer adverts (cancer affects everyone but even if it is does not relate to breast cancer (although men get that too), you will see pink everywhere
  11. All bingo and on line gambling adverts (especially for Sun Bingo) where men are either totally excluded or mainly excluded (except 21)
  12. Pay day loan adverts (where you generally see, with exceptions, that it is always the women fixing the problem by thinking of a pay day loan company)
  13. Haven Holidays (where two pretty little girls are used in the advert. This could be considered one of the worst as the production company is just using the girls because of their gender and for no other reason)
  14. Adverts that have a voice over artist (as most of these are done by women artists)
  15. Experion (you would not see women in these so called funny adverts)
  16. The television channel known as “W” (this is directed at purely women and is part of the UK TV channel portfolio) Need I say more. It is not number two because the whole channel can be avoided but for Murdoch Mysteries, it cannot as it floods both the Drama and Alibi channel (please refer to my post https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/3127)
Featured

Why women are allowed to get their own way, ALWAYS

Let’s face it, where there is a woman and a man in a relationship, who is the one that gets their own way? The answer is women and I will tell you why.

It is not just that most women are devious and can look at someone straight in the eye and lie but it actually comes down to what would happen if a man put his foot down and refused to agree to something, whether it be a holiday, a house or just about anything?

Yes, some of these subject matters may seem inconsequential but if there is a rift, on even a small thing, that rift gets larger and larger, with the sad end result that the relationship breaks down.

It does not matter if the woman sleeps around or not during this process, as the justice system, as it stands will always but always favour the woman over the man.

I thought my first marriage was going well. Yes with bumps in the road but no marriage is perfect. Yes, I would concede on a number of things to keep her sweet and sadly most women in a deep relationship rely on the fact.

I have proved that my first wife purposely broke up the marriage. She started committing adultery with my best friend, without my knowledge, and pushed me so far that I could take no more and started arguing with her. Anyone who knows me well, will know that I was very laid back but, when push came to shove, if I thought that what was going on or was about to happen was wrong, I would say so.

Here is a classic example. She moaned at me for spending £50 on a chest to keep all of my cufflinks in but was happy to spend over £3,500 on a remote controlled gas fire place that I never saw because it was installed when we were on our “trial separation”. I still treasure that cufflink box but that very expensive fireplace is long gone. She also wanted a conservatory earlier on. I said that we did not need it but she said that it was her money that she was spending and she could do with it as she pleased. But I thought that we were married and a married couple share things and agree on most things, especially to do with the family home.

The so called trial separation then instantly became a “I want a divorce” and she financially raped me, taking everything that I had worked so hard for. After all, I had paid for the mortgage and the deposit on the house.

After the divorce, I was left with fuck all and I was in a worse state than when I bought my first home in Guildford, years before; I had saved up most of the money that I had earned from working at my father’s company and more besides when I was working in my first proper job at Wilkins Kennedy.

But all of that was taken away from me. I lost so much that I had to live with my parents for six months before my father agreed to lend me money to buy my home in Brockham.

In my second marriage, it was she who walked out on me. She had brought zip into the marriage; in fact, she brought debt, which I paid off for her. But she was having an affair with a woman but swore blind in court that her children were to live with her, which there was no intention of happening, as the children’s father found out that she was a sapphist and took the children under his wing.

So, after bringing in nothing but debt to a one year marriage, I had to pay out £225,000 to her. That is not bad, is it?

That is why I am so fucked financially and am imprisoned on this island.

Do you see now why men will always give into their partners? Because they do not want to experience what has happened to me and many other men; THAT IS WHY.

It is just not just the money as that is somewhat immaterial although painful. It is the fact that in a break up, the woman always takes the children and more often than not, turns the children against their biological father.

So, the women get loads of money to buy a new house, take the children and then installs a puppy of a lover, who will agree to whatever she asks or says because otherwise he will suffer the same fate

THAT IS WHY MEN WILL ALWAYS BUT ALWAYS GIVE IN TO THEIR PARTNERS.

It is a cliche to say that most women “wear the trousers” but that is why it is so true

Featured

David’s top ten(ish) of the most demeaning and female gender biased adverts and dramas (and sometimes films) about men.

This chart, which will be regularly updated and will be kept near the top of all of my posts, as I will apply a “sticky” to it.

Adverts that are “gender related” are excluded, such as for tampons, make up (of which there are so many), Viagra and those for incontinence (although you will never see one for men) Let’s face it, if you scroll through the adverts, you will see more women’s faces as compared to those of men.

  1. Murdoch Mysteries (I have talked at great length about this light hearted drama so please refer to specific posts, of which there are a great deal). The female gender bias and demeaning of men are incessant. In addition, through so called chance meetings with Dr Ogden, she more than occasionally gives ideas to Murdoch that end up solving the crime. HENCE THE NUMBER ONE SPOT, for so many reasons.
  2. UK TV channel “W” (Too much to say here but please refer to my post https://wordpress.com/post/davidhender.life/3127)
  3. Totally Money.com (for adverts that ask if “he has a big one” or quoting the numbers “6,7 and 8whilst Anthea Turner moves her hands apart implying a question as to how long his member is), if not via double entendres but you would never see that applied to a woman
  4. Woucher (where most of the adverts see three women, prancing around as though they were prostitutes)
  5. Woucher (where men are seen prancing around looking like sheer dickheads)
  6. KFC (using only women with so called hip London accents)
  7. Boots (where their adverts are mainly directed at women)
  8. Experion (you would not see women in these so called funny adverts)
  9. Cancer adverts (cancer affects everyone but even if it is does not relate to breast cancer (although men get that too), you will see pink everywhere
  10. All bingo and on line gambling adverts (especially for Sun Bingo) where men are either totally excluded or mainly excluded (except 21)
  11. Pay day loan adverts (where you generally see, with exceptions, that it is always the women fixing the problem by thinking of a pay day loan company)
  12. Haven Holidays (where two pretty little girls are used in the advert. This could be considered one of the worst as the production company is just using the girls because of their gender and for no other reason)
  13. Adverts that have a voice over artist (as most of these are done by women artists)
  14. Our time over 50s online dating (80% female actresses, 20% male actors, 100% female voice over artists)
  15. The television channel known as “W” (this is directed at purely women and is part of the UK TV channel portfolio) Need I say more. It is not number two because the whole channel can be avoided but for Murdoch Mysteries, it cannot as it floods both the Drama and Alibi channel
Featured

WHY I AM DUE COMPENSATION FROM BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER, PAICOLEX TRUST MANAGEMENT AG AND WILLIAM HENDER, MY OWN FATHER

The email below should help everyone to understand as to why I am due significant compensation from these three entities. I am not going to “reinvent the wheel” as the details in the email below are self explanatory

Compensation payments
This message was sent with High importance.
David Hender
Thu 02/05/2019 09:55
  • Lisa Mayhew Managing Partner Berwin Leighton;
  •  Clare Edwards (Paicolex);
  •  Bill Hender;
  •  Andrew Lugg (Paicolex Chairman)

+3 others

You may all believe that the compensation payments are unjustified but they are not.
With regard to Paicolex Trust Management AG
The trust company and its trust officers must make independent decisions as to payments out of the trust. The trust officers were clearly not independent and have therefore breached their fiduciary and legal duties to both the trust itself and to the beneficiaries.
This grave misconduct has resulted in one of the beneficiaries (i.e. me) being not only financially disadvantaged but has caused me significant emotional and physical harm and has been the primary cause of my psoriasis, a very painful affliction, cause by huge amounts of stress.
The trust officers have been well aware for a number of years of the brain cancer removal operation that has subsequently caused a very high susceptibility to stress and have thus put myself in significant personal physical danger. It is no exaggeration to say that I could have had a fatal heart attack at any time.
With regard to Berwin Leighton Paisner
 
As the holding company of the above, Berwin Leighton Paisner is to be held ultimately responsible for Paicolex’s actions and the grave effects that were caused to myself. Not only that, but BLP has been made aware countless times of all situations pertaining to me and they, including the Managing Partner, Lisa Mayhew, completely ignored my concerns and took no action whatsoever to protect me. They have, by their own admission, failed to bring to task those responsible for behaving in this way towards me and are thus just as culpable as Paicolex, as if Berwin Leighton Paisner had made those unfair and dishonest decisions and acted in a prejudicial way towards me and have thus breached their own fiduciary and legal duty of care that should have been afforded to me.
With regards to William Thomas Hender, my father
He has acted in a manner that has been highly prejudicial to me and has behaved outside his duties and responsibilities to the trust. By his actions, in demanding that the trust officers effect certain transactions that have caused me much distress and emotional harm, he too is culpable for his actions and must pay compensation as a result.
With regards to Paicolex Trust Management AG, Berwin Leighton Paisner and William Thomas Hender
All of the above parties have acted in concert in attempting to financially ruin me and to cause me harm, a level of harm that cannot, by any account, be monetised but a figure there has to be. No amount of money can assuage the level of harm that has been caused to me by the parties conspiring against me and by agreeing that spurious amounts of debt are due, by deducting sums, without my consent  (which goes against every rule in the book as to legal and fiduciary duties of care) and for all acting in such an unprofessional way as to an outsider believing that the trust and its assets are to do with as they please.
I cannot force the termination of employment of those individuals who directly acted in a way that was against my interest but removal of those employees, it has to be.
By the continual failure to hold those responsible to account, including Lisa Mayhew,the Managing Partner of Berwin Leighton Paisner, all of the entities have continually failed in their fundamental duty of care to the law and have failed in their legal and fiduciary duty of care to me, as a beneficiary.
In any firm that is professionally run, those people involved would have all be sacked for gross misconduct or removed from office for the same offence and walked out of the door by security, with no compensation for loss of office being paid but Berwin Leighton Paisner and Paicolex Trust Management AG have failed in even that fundamental basic responsibility. 
It is quite clear, by their own inaction and actions, that neither Berwin Leighton Paisner or Paicolex Trust Management AG can ever be trusted to either abide by the law or to protect the beneficiaries of a trust from harm but would rather throw away their independence and take instructions as to how the trust should be handled by a third party or associates of that third party.
I cannot take Paicolex to court as its is outside the jurisdiction of UK law but by suing Berwin Leighton Paisner, it would be a case of Goliath, with its massive funds, against a David, who has few funds but has been subjected to continual and conspiratorial harm by all parties.
Regards
Featured

Is there any male actor brave enough?

I wish the injustice done to me, to be known by the masses.

I have contacted various British actors, as it is a British story but all of them have never replied; they are more worried about their careers and bank balances to get involved.

They are all cowards

This is what the female gender sadly rely on. They know that no one will speak out through whatever media but they are all too vocal themselves about what they have supposedly gone through, some true but a lot lies.

So, I ask the world, as I know that many people around the world, from many many countries, read my blog.

IS THERE ANY MALE ACTOR IN THE WORLD WHO IS PREPARED TO PUT HIS HEAD ABOVE THE PARAPET AND TELL MY STORY?

Featured

I want to make a difference

That was the reply that I got from my daughter when I expressed my concern for her to go into family law. But I was so very proud of her when she made that statement.

Regular readers will be familiar of my morality and I, too, would like to make a difference. I hate politicians and it is quite late in the day for me but maybe one of the better ways of me trying to improve the morality of the political scene is to go into politics, as I would be hypocritical to just stand on the sidelines and do nothing.

But here is the rub. I would never achieve my goal. Why? Because, even if I wanted to follow that path,everyone who would prefer the status quo, would do anything to bring me down.

And down they would bring me because, even though I was proved to be innocent of any crime by the Police, I am still tainted by those false accusations. A great number of people are like sheep and when my past was exposed, they would apply the “no smoke without fire” principal and I would be damned.

In fact, I would be damned whatever I do in the future. Those false accusations will follow me until I am dead and cremated and even after that because everyone in the papers like to expose what they see as the truth, even if it is completely false.

I am surprised that my father, Berwin Leighton Paisner and Paicolex Trust Management AG have not done that already to blacken my character, to put people off the scent of what has really gone on or maybe they are just holding that in reserve in case I go too far, which I have every intention of doing.

Through her selfishness and greed, my daughter’s accusations have damned me, regardless of what I now try and achieve, my projects, quite literally anything and everything.

Verity has damned me for life

If I had a new family, would Verity have damned their lives too?

As a footnote, I would normally send the link to this post to Verity to attempt to convince her to tell the truth and to release me from this millstone but I have no intention of doing so. I have tried for years to help her understand what she has done, to lay down so many olive branches but she does not care a damn. She would not even confirm that she was safe or alright, which clearly is now a measure of that person.

 

Featured

I am going to keep living until I am alive again

With what has gone on and what is going on in my life, there is nothing that I can do apart from keeping on living until I can deal with all of the hurt that has been inflicted on me.

I cannot just roll over and die. I have low will power but have the will to carry on until I see the light again.

Over the last few days, I have come to realise that for whatever reason, I am unlikely to see Verity ever again. I feared for her safety but she could not even send me a two worded email saying “okay Dad”. That would have given me so much relief.

She has become so very selfish, more than I could ever imagine someone to become; it would seem that my darling Verity, my little girl is lost to me and I do not even know the reason why. I can guess but will never know for certain, as it would be only Verity, from the family, who would ever tell me the real truth.

The only hope that I can muster is nothing to do with Verity, although I will always long for her to be in my life again but is to carry on fighting, as that is now all that I can do.

Hopefully, one day soon, I will be off this fucking island and out of this house that haunts me so much and be in a new place where I can start afresh, yet again.

To that end, I will continue to embarrass all of the people who have wronged me and get what is rightfully mine to enable me to start a new life.

I am so very tired and sleep more and more each day but I have this fire inside me to keep me going and to do what is right.

If it means destroying my only income source, sobeit. If it means tearing down the corruption in Berwin Leighton Paisner and Paicolex Trust Management AG, sobeit. If it means exposing my father as a tax evader and child abuser, with him being locked up, sobeit.

I have to harden myself up for the challenge. If I get a call to help my father, for whatever reason, I will just ignore it. Let the people who have benefited so much from him, pull their fingers out of the arses and help him for once in their life. He can no longer ask me to set everything aside and to rely on my kind nature.

My family does not exist to me; it has all gone, including my beloved Verity.

Featured

IT NEVER CEASES TO AMAZE ME…..

……. that despite all of the cast iron evidence that Berwin Leighton Paisner, Paicolex Trust Management AG and my so called father have contrived to financially stitch me up, some of the evidence I might add that was sent by Paicolex itself to me, they have completely IGNORED REALITY and have done what they have always done, which is to continue to treat me unfairly as compared to my brother, with regards to the financial assistance provided by the Hender Family Settlement.

Not only that, but they have completely ignored my submissions of fact that stated that my father now has advanced Alzheimer’s and that he should not be in control of the trust.

The only person who responded was Andrew Lugg, the chairman of Paicolex, who quite unbelievably stated “that he had no intention of removing my father as “UK representative of the trust”,( which you can translate into the controller and settlor of the trust) “for having Alzheimer’s”.

Alzheimer’s is a very sad and dreadful disease; I should know as my Mum had it too. But to ignore the fact that his irrationality and delusional behaviour caused by the disease still allows him to control a £25M plus trust is simply irresponsible and PROFESSIONALLY NEGLIGENT

Here are the emails sent by my own family that show that he incapable of even sending an email. What has Martin got to do with it?

RE: Dad
Martin Hender <martin@castlecombebrewery.co.uk>
Mon 10/07/2017 14:46
  • ‘David Hender’;
  •  billhender321@outlook.com;
  •  ‘Ali Hender’

David,

Never, never threaten me. Dad is perfectly fine, and has just returned from 2 weeks holiday, in the NF and Wales. He tried to email you last week but used an incorrect address and it bounced back. He or I will try and re-send.

I will say this only once. If you do anything against dad’s will, you will have me and all I can muster raining down on you. You are the one who should be taken in to care, just reflect on your behaviour over the last few years. You are a sad individual with far too much time on your hands. I suggest you sort out your own life before interfering with others.

End of communication. Copied to Dad.

Martin. IF THIS DOES NOT SHOUT ALZHEIMER’S, I DO NOT KNOW WHAT DOES

Re: Fw: Bill Hender
LORI CAMERON <loric2422@gmail.com>
Tue 04/07/2017 15:42
  • You

David, why would you forward your letter to Brenda to your father.  This will get his armour up.  Be very careful David how you tread please.

Very concerned,
Lots of love,
Pat oxox

The question is this; why would she know about my emails unless she had been in regular contact with my father; not just the once a week that she said she contacted him

RE: Inequities
Bill Hender <billhender321@outlook.com>
Thu 02/03/2017 09:03
  • david_hender@hotmail.co.uk;
  •  martinhender@btinternet.com

I am now very tired of receiving your  e-mails and I am taking legal steps to stop you.  If you come to Ashtead I will not see you, and you would have had an expensive wasted journey. Your continued reference concerning money and my health is little more than harassment. Once and for all I am in perfect good health despite your allegations. By your continued attitude to wards me , I no longer know you as my son.

Dad

HE WAS DIAGNOSED TO HAVE EARLY ONSET ALZHEIMER’S TWO YEARS BEFORE THIS EMAIL. PERFECT HEALTH? SADLY RUBBISH. IT IS CLEAR EVEN BY THIS TIME, HE HAD BECOME DELUSIONAL

Re: Verity’s maintenance adj
samantha.parkinson@daimler.com
Mon 14/03/2016 19:28
  • david_hender@hotmail.co.uk
Don’t threaten me David, what do you have a letter from an irate mother in law.
I included your father as he had discussed your maintenance with Verity and I was keeping him in the loop. 
I would like a letter from your solicitor.
You really are a very nasty man, especially after all the help I gave you when Roseanna left you.
Sam
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

THIS EMAIL PROVES THAT MY EX WIFE WAS IN LEAGUE WITH MY FATHER – WHAT THE “F” HAS MY DAUGHTER’S MAINTENANCE GOT TO DO WITH HIM. ANSWER. NOTHING.

THIS WAS ONE MONTH BEFORE MY FALSE ARREST

RE: Verity’s maintenance adj
samantha.parkinson@daimler.com
Mon 14/03/2016 16:14
  • david_hender@hotmail.co.uk;
  •  stuart.parkinson@rsmuk.com;
  •  billhender@hotmail.com

Hi David

I have just made some enquiries and you are liable to pay the maintenance up until she starts university in October and therefore you have to pay to cover the holiday period, so the 15th September will be the last payment for the final two weeks of that month if you have indeed paid in advance, if you have paid in arrears the payment on the 15th September needs to be for six weeks.

Please confirm that you will be paying these until the 15th September, as I really don’t want to go down the court order enforcement route but will if I have to.

I will also check all my paperwork to confirm whether or not these maintenance payment were paid in advance.

Then from the 15th September 2016 we no longer need to correspond.

Bill I have copied you in as I understand you had a conversation with Verity in this regard, so just keeping you informed.

Kind regards

Samantha Parkinson

Accountant Brentford and Heathrow

South London Market Area

Mercedes Benz Brentford

Great West Road

Brentford

Middlesex

TW8 9AH

Tel: 020 8560 2151

m. 07826 533533

YET MORE EVIDENCE THAT MY EX WIFE WAS IN LEAGUE WITH MY FATHER. AND NOW HER CURRENT HUSBAND. WHY?

Hender Family Trust / December 2015 interest on David Hender consolidated loan
Thomas Meier <thomas.meier@paicolex.ch>
Mon 15/02/2016 09:56
  • ‘David Hender’;
  •  John Marriott

Dear David,

Thank you very much for your mail of 13th February together with the amended and updated loan and interest position. This looks fine and is agreed – with one exception.

The position “Adjustment” has never been accepted and is not agreed. I would therefore appreciate if you would kindly remove this entry and adjust the interest calculation with the next payment. (I AGREED TO REMOVE THE ADJUSTMENT)

Best wishes and kind regards

Thomas

SO THE LOAN BALANCE WAS AGREED WITHOUT EXCEPTION SAVE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT, SUBSEQUENTLY RECTIFIED. BUT NOW, THEY CHANGE THEIR TUNE

ALSO, WHY IS JOHN MARRIOTT, MY FATHER’S LACKIE, BEING COPIED IN? YET MORE AND MORE COMPLICITY

Computer hacking
Bill Hender <billhender@hotmail.com>
Wed 20/01/2016 20:19
  • David;
  •  Bernard Reed;
  •  Thomas Meier Paicolex;
  •  Martin home;
  •  Ron Downhill;
  •  Alexander Tate;
  •  john Marriott;
  •  Anita Rauser;
  •  Lori
+4 others 

David

It is my belief that you are hacking into my computer, as you appear to have information of my present and future plans both financially and private. If my assumption is correct, you must immediately cease these activities. If you use any of the information that you have recovered and which you use to my disadvantage, I will commence proceedings against you. I am changing my pass word and e-mail address and will only communicate these to people that I can trust. Sadly you will not be amongst  them 
Dad

 

SO, HE IS NOT ONLY DELUSIONAL BUT HANDING OUT HIS PASSWORD, LIKE CONFETTI, TO JUST ABOUT EVERYONE

General
Bill Hender <billhender@hotmail.com>
Sat 09/01/2016 08:19
  • David;
  •  Thomas Meier Paicolex

David

Thank you for your Christmas card, it was thoughtful of you.I received a thank you from Verity, who says she will be in touch.
I am preparing the accounts of A.S.C and I need your assistance with regard to your bridging loans.
1) Have you repaid as instructed by the Court the outstanding interest on the loan for the purchase of Nepcote House.
2) Could you please let me have a schedule of the individual amounts that were advance to you  under the new bridging loan showing the amount, date and purpose.
3) Can I also have a schedule of the amounts you have repaid showing again the amount, date and purpose
4) Would you let me have the  calculations  of the interest you owe up to 31st December 2015
5) Has the work been completed on Nepcote House, and if so, has it been placed on the market at what price
Many thanks
Dad

 

IN 2016, WHEN HIS ALZHEIMER’S HAD NOT BITTEN HARD, HE WAS PREPARED TO TAKE MY FIGURES FOR THE AMOUNTS ADVANCED BUT ONLY THREE YEARS LATER, HE STARTED TO INCLUDE ERRONEOUS FIGURES THAT WERE FACTUALLY PROVED TO BE INCORRECT, AS HIS ALZHEIMER’S SADLY PROGRESSED

RE: Verity
Bill Hender <billhender@hotmail.com>
Fri 18/12/2015 22:19
  • David
David
Thank you for Verity’s address. I will be away for Christmas and to early in the New Year both at Martins and South Lawn.
As 2015 is nearing its end, I send you my best wishes for 2016. We do not see eye to eye and therefore for both our sakes,  we should keep away from one and other. Saying that, you are my son and I will always love you despite the bitterness in the past. You will not be for gotten in my will, and nor will Verity.
I am very happy doing the things I want, and for what ever time I have left, I want to continue that without any aggravation or stress, which occurs when we were together. Have a happy life and try to enjoy yourself and make real friends.
Dad

THREE YEARS LATER, AS HIS ALZHEIMER’S STARTED TO BITE, HE SAID THAT I WAS NOT HIS SON AND HE WAS DISINHERITING ME

Martin Hender and School Fees.
Bill Hender <billhender@hotmail.com>
Fri 18/12/2015 12:00
  • Anita Rauser;
  •  Martin home;
  •  David

Dear Anita

I am still acting on behalf of Martin for Tax matters. HMRC gave him a large tax credit which meant that although the original amount to be paid on his behalf from his tax account by 31st January 2016 ,was £16,225.86 this has been reduced to £603.74.I will ask Martin to instruct his bank by this e-mail  to pay this amount in January ref. 8098796152K Credit account No. 157 8006  Nat. West Bank PLC  Collections A/C H.M Revenue  Customs.  Santander. Bootle. Merseyside          L30  4UA Sort Code 57-80-06.
I have received invoices for the childrens’ school fees for next term.
Will you kindly instruct Cazenove to transfer £16,500 to Barclays Bank from Capital  Account  to Hender Family Settlement  GBP EASA CAP School Fees A/C Client 000542520 DECH-GBP-C004
The individual invoices are;
Fresham Heights HSBC Farnham Branch Sort Code 40-21-05 Account No. 01511270
Ref. Invoice 13304 Account Ref. 08529 / 7643 £9270. re. Miss V . Hender
King Edwards School  Bath. Nat. West.  Sort Code 600205 A/C No. 83527818 Ref. Pupil No. HEN08 Bill No. 0086873
   Miss Iyshea B. Hender £4,354.35
King Edwards School Bath.Nat. West. Sort Code 600205 A/C  No.83527818 Ref.Pupil No. HEN06 Bill No. 0086870
   Miss. Francesca G. Hender £4,354.35
The School Fees have to be paid by 5th January 2016
Many thanks for all your help
Kindest regards
Bill

 

THIS IS PROOF THAT HE WAS TAKING MONEY OUT OF THE TRUST, WITHOUT PAYING TAX TO PAY FOR MARTIN’S CHILDREN’S SCHOOL FEES

THIS IS ILLEGAL AS INCOME MUST ALL BE DISTRIBUTED BEFORE CAPITAL CAN BE PAID OUT. THIS IS TAX EVASION

General
Bill Hender <billhender@hotmail.com>
Fri 10/07/2015 13:00
  • David

I will retract what I said concerning you doing the tax as it is rather complex. That is if you want me too.

If yes,  will you send me the tax return if you have recently received it signed please.
Your instalment for tax payable by 31st July 2015 is £15,398.05 and I would write to Inita in the usual way with a copy to you Will you let me know the balance on your tax bank account after a payment of £15,398.05.
I have been having conversations with Ron concerning tax on dividends, and will continue doing so now we have a budget. Will you let me know if you paid any charitable payments in the year ended 5th April 2015, and the amount that you received from Barclays for interest in 2014/15. The HMRC would not allow you to claim, for your subscription to Chartered Accountants as you received no income for being a A.C.A. It might be worth having a talk with the Institute and explain to them that you can not work, with a view to reducing your subscription which I believe is £300 p.a.
You may have guessed that I was involved with the Trust when they considered your future. The Amount to be loaned of
£20,000 in addition to the main loan,  is to restore the building for a higher sale price. I explained to Ron that an agreement must be made with her solicitors prior to any work being started,  that Rosanna would not receive more that £295.000 irrespective of the sale price obtained. You might want to consider Tino to paint the outside and possibly help with the garden. His wage is £15 per hour and telephone  07882 535219. You should get a receipt for any money paid, but reassure Tino that this is just for the lenders to see.
I am transferring what money I have at Barclays Wealth with Barclays Retail at Leatherhead under George. Will you let me know if this is also your wish. You will then have to give instructions.
I also intend to consult Thomas for Barclays Retail ( George ) to handle your accounts with A.S.C and also to handle the school accounts. The mistakes that the administration at Barclays Wealth made do not want to be repeated.
Incidentally , I wrote to DVLA and my insurers to advise them that I had a minor and I repeat minor form of dementia.
dad

THIS NOT ONLY SHOWS THAT HE WAS IN LEAGUE WITH RON DOWNHILL TO CHEAT HMRC OUT OF TAX RIGHTFULLY DUE BUT HE HAS CONFESSED HIMSELF IN WRITING THAT HE HAS ALZHEIMER’S. IF HE HAD SENT SUCH A LETTER TO THE DVLA, THEY WOULD HAVE TAKEN AWAY HIS LICENSE. THAT IS THE LAW

From: billhender@hotmail.com
To: thomas.meier@paicolex.ch
Subject: RE: The way forward
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:34:20 +0000

Dear Thomas

You are aware of the reason that the Trustees deducted Verity’s school fees from David’s dividend. I would be pleased if you could reverse this for David and also for Martin, providing that following the Court hearing you would not be committing perjury.
Kindest regards
Bill

THIS SHOWS THAT MY FATHER TOLD THE TRUSTEES WHAT TO DO. PAICOLEX TRUST MANAGEMENT AG WERE THEREFORE NOT INDEPENDENT AND IS FURTER PROOF THAT MY FATHER CONTROLLED THE TRUST

(There is plenty more but this post is getting far too long. But all of the proof will go in the SRA submission. A lot of time needed but there is no great rush.)

I have warned them that I will be reporting the relevant people to the Solicitors Regulation Authority AND The Law Society but that still seems to have given them no incentive to make the changes that I have sought.

It just goes to show the complete arrogance of institutions like Berwin Leighton Paisner and Paicolex Trust Management AG, who ignore blatant facts, as it is in their financial interests to do so.

Not only are their actions and inaction illegal but it GRAVELY calls into questions their adherence to professional ethics and professional conduct, all for the goal of increasing Berwin Leighton Paisner’s value.

I have already posted the SRA’s Form 1 5(1) for the parties who have to comply with the professional ethics and regulations of the SRA and so that part is done.

What I have to do now is to complete the sworn submissions with regard to Lisa Mayhew, Clare Edwards, Gaby Kaiser and Ron Downhill but I have been side tracked by what is really important to me and that is my daughter and that does take it out of me.

I have had enough of their churlish behaviour. I will complete my sworn statements, send them with the requisite forms and ONLY then, will I post onto my blog. No more warnings, no more opportunities to put things right; in fact, nothing.

  • Sod the unpaid dividends that I am due
  • Sod the compensation that I am sue for them putting me through so much distress

WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT TO ME IS JUSTICE

I am sure that the SRA will endeavour to whitewash the whole debacle but not only are Surrey Police very interested in the web of deceipt, as it links to the abuse of my daughter and my nieces, but I have my 6,000 plus visitors to my blog, who will spread the word about the dishonest and deceitful way in which this so called icon of UK corporate law firms really behaves.

Not only that but I have my father’s very own emails to detail what money has been paid and to whom and the reason why, together with the fact that he confirmed, in writing,

THAT I WILL RECEIVE DIVIDENDS FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.

THE HMRC WILL JUST LOVE THAT

SO MUCH FOR A DISCRETIONARY SETTLEMENT

I have all the facts, I have countless emails from Paicolex to evidence my case and a number of emails from Gaby Kaiser as well, in which she literally shoots herself in the foot.

Featured

Let me cut the wood from the trees THE FALSE ABUSE CLAIMS

A great deal has been said by me of the possible scenarios of what happened but let me take it right back to basics.

  1. I tried to contact Verity’s mother and she responded in a text that it was Pat (aka Lori Cameron) who said that I had sexually abused Verity
  2. Pat in a previous email had said that I had admitted to abusing Verity in the bedroom
  3. But, when I was interrogated by the Police, they accused me of abusing Verity in my car.

Clearly, all of that is totally inconsistent with each other supposed fact, which means that the allegations made by Pat were false as were the allegations made by Verity’s mother. Both Pat and Verity’s mother did it for one thing and one thing only…

MONEY – Even Pat had told me that Verity’s mother had been paid

Furthermore, if I had abused Verity in the car, they would have taken it away for forensic analysis but they did not.

INDEED, THE POLICE NEVER TOUCHED THE CAR AT ALL

What does that tell you? Well, what it tells me is that

  • Pat, my father and Verity’s mother conspired with each other to provide false facts
  • The Police treated the allegations as completely true but then failed to support that by taking evidence from my car
  • The Police knew from the outset that the allegations were false but undertook my arrest and the investigation purely because of my father’s masonic links with the Police.
  • It took me just three months, working on my own, for a layman to prove that I was totally innocent of all such disgusting allegations
  • Verity had lied through her teeth, either because she had been abused by her grandfather or because he had manipulated and bribed her, either emotionally or financially.
Featured

WHY I AM DUE COMPENSATION FROM BERWIN LEIGHTON PAISNER, PAICOLEX TRUST MANAGEMENT AG AND WILLIAM HENDER, MY OWN FATHER

The email below should help everyone to understand as to why I am due significant compensation from these three entities. I am not going to “reinvent the wheel” as the details in the email below are self explanatory

Compensation payments
This message was sent with High importance.
David Hender
Thu 02/05/2019 09:55
  • Lisa Mayhew Managing Partner Berwin Leighton;
  •  Clare Edwards (Paicolex);
  •  Bill Hender;
  •  Andrew Lugg (Paicolex Chairman)

+3 others

You may all believe that the compensation payments are unjustified but they are not.
With regard to Paicolex Trust Management AG
The trust company and its trust officers must make independent decisions as to payments out of the trust. The trust officers were clearly not independent and have therefore breached their fiduciary and legal duties to both the trust itself and to the beneficiaries.
This grave misconduct has resulted in one of the beneficiaries (i.e. me) being not only financially disadvantaged but has caused me significant emotional and physical harm and has been the primary cause of my psoriasis, a very painful affliction, cause by huge amounts of stress.
The trust officers have been well aware for a number of years of the brain cancer removal operation that has subsequently caused a very high susceptibility to stress and have thus put myself in significant personal physical danger. It is no exaggeration to say that I could have had a fatal heart attack at any time.
With regard to Berwin Leighton Paisner
 
As the holding company of the above, Berwin Leighton Paisner is to be held ultimately responsible for Paicolex’s actions and the grave effects that were caused to myself. Not only that, but BLP has been made aware countless times of all situations pertaining to me and they, including the Managing Partner, Lisa Mayhew, completely ignored my concerns and took no action whatsoever to protect me. They have, by their own admission, failed to bring to task those responsible for behaving in this way towards me and are thus just as culpable as Paicolex, as if Berwin Leighton Paisner had made those unfair and dishonest decisions and acted in a prejudicial way towards me and have thus breached their own fiduciary and legal duty of care that should have been afforded to me.
With regards to William Thomas Hender, my father
He has acted in a manner that has been highly prejudicial to me and has behaved outside his duties and responsibilities to the trust. By his actions, in demanding that the trust officers effect certain transactions that have caused me much distress and emotional harm, he too is culpable for his actions and must pay compensation as a result.
With regards to Paicolex Trust Management AG, Berwin Leighton Paisner and William Thomas Hender
All of the above parties have acted in concert in attempting to financially ruin me and to cause me harm, a level of harm that cannot, by any account, be monetised but a figure there has to be. No amount of money can assuage the level of harm that has been caused to me by the parties conspiring against me and by agreeing that spurious amounts of debt are due, by deducting sums, without my consent  (which goes against every rule in the book as to legal and fiduciary duties of care) and for all acting in such an unprofessional way as to an outsider believing that the trust and its assets are to do with as they please.
I cannot force the termination of employment of those individuals who directly acted in a way that was against my interest but removal of those employees, it has to be.
By the continual failure to hold those responsible to account, including Lisa Mayhew,the Managing Partner of Berwin Leighton Paisner, all of the entities have continually failed in their fundamental duty of care to the law and have failed in their legal and fiduciary duty of care to me, as a beneficiary.
In any firm that is professionally run, those people involved would have all be sacked for gross misconduct or removed from office for the same offence and walked out of the door by security, with no compensation for loss of office being paid but Berwin Leighton Paisner and Paicolex Trust Management AG have failed in even that fundamental basic responsibility. 
It is quite clear, by their own inaction and actions, that neither Berwin Leighton Paisner or Paicolex Trust Management AG can ever be trusted to either abide by the law or to protect the beneficiaries of a trust from harm but would rather throw away their independence and take instructions as to how the trust should be handled by a third party or associates of that third party.
I cannot take Paicolex to court as its is outside the jurisdiction of UK law but by suing Berwin Leighton Paisner, it would be a case of Goliath, with its massive funds, against a David, who has few funds but has been subjected to continual and conspiratorial harm by all parties.
Regards
Featured

Berwin Leighton Paisner and Paicolex Trust Management AG are mere puppets of my father, WILLIAM THOMAS HENDER

Here we go again; what is that song? “Puppets on a string”

And if you wish to contact my father, his phone number is redacted and his address is redacted.

You can also email him at redacted

TELL HIM WHAT YOU THINK OF HIM

You can also email that crook, Claire Edwards, at Paicolex Trust Management AG.

Her email address is redacted and her phone number is redacted

Re: Income Payments
This message was sent with High importance.
David Hender
Fri 26/04/2019 15:19
  • Clare Edwards;
  •  Lisa Mayhew Managing Partner Berwin Leighton;
  •  Andrew Lugg (Paicolex Chairman);
  •  Ron Downhill;
  •  Gaby Kaiser;
  •  Martin Hender
Dear Miss Edwards,
You can send me that letter as many times as you like but you clearly do not appreciate my intellect.
As you know, I am a chartered accountant and forensic auditor of many years experience and your explanations just “do not wash”.
Here are my reasons for your explanations to be sheer and unadulterated rubbish
  • You clearly are just a pen pusher and whilst you are described as a trust officer, you do not know the first thing about trusts. The moment that the trust receives money, all beneficiaries are liable to tax on those dividends, NOT when they are physically paid the relevant monies
  • If an amount appears as an advanced receipt, ignoring the tax implications, it would appear in the following years accounts. As you will see from the attached, it does not, with £300,000 being received and paid AFTER the tax year commencement
  • For the subsequent year, the amount of £300,000 CANNOT  appear in both the profit and loss account AND the balance sheet
  • I strongly suggest that whilst Martin declared his “normal” dividend, he never declared the extra dividends of £245,000 and £300,000 respectively. I will be writing a separate letter to HMRC PURELY on this point and Martin will be subject to heavy fines, penalties and interest
Given your compliant intransigence and your complicity with my father, the compensation payments have now risen to£300,000 each. Every time that you declare a falsehood, the amount of compensation will increase by an additional £100,000
Regards
Featured

My father is and has always been CORRUPT

I have always looked up to my father, even when we have disagreed.

I saw him build up his first company, General Guarantee Corporation, which was part of the GUS empire.

He always waxed lyrical about how he got the attention of the then owner of GUS, the late Sir Isaac Wolfson.

My father was working for what is now PWC and was asked by Sir Isaac to go in and rescue his investment from a failing company. My father went in and collected money for Sir Isaac, which he kept in a suitcase under his bed.

Why under the bed? Well, what my father was actually doing was to “prefer” Sir Isaac’s investment above all other creditors and so it could not be put in a bank. He BROKE THE LAW.

Sir Isaac got ALL of his money back and was so impressed that he invited my father to start up General Guarantee Corporation or GGC for short.

Using the money of GUS, he built up one of the then largest hire purchase companies in the UK. To get business, which was mainly for cars, he did deals with the dodgy car dealers and so his corruption continued.

He was so successful that he ended up on the main board of GUS as group finance director. GUS and GGC got bigger and they did deals with all sorts of people, one of them being Wells Fargo bank to start up a charge card company for fleets of motor vehicles to buy fuel. It was quite successful for a while but then got into trouble and so my father was put in charge of the sale.

Sir Isaac had retired by then and had been replaced by Lord Leonard Wolfson, his cousin, who is now also dead.

The deal to sale this fuel card company, called Overdrive, went sour and my father was blamed for it by Wolfson. Whether it was his fault or not, I do not know but such was the scale of the blame, he snapped and drove back from London with a flat tyre, not knowing what had happened.

He was now a broken man and was put in the Priory. After a while, I was permitted to bring him home at weekends. He always loved driving but his nerves were completely shot and nearly went through the roof when a car pulled out of a side road and I had to slam on the breaks.

My mother and I cared for him at weekends. I have no idea where Martin was but he was always absent, a position that he took time and time again when there was a family crisis, even when later on, my mother was suffering from Alzheimer’s and my father from a heart condition.

Years passed and he recovered, to an extent anyway. I do not believe that he was ever the same again.

Then this offer came along to start up Premium Credit but as a consultant. PC grew and grew and for reasons that are unimportant, a management buy out was planned. I remember them all toasting each other in London when the deal was done, as all of them had become rich men, very rich.

Ignoring the other participants, when the sale to a third party would be made, my father would become even richer but he did not want to pay any capital gains tax when that happened. It was also a useful tool to protect that money from inheritance tax if he died suddenly.

The management buy out scheme was set up to ensure that my father’s interests were put in a trust so that the UK tax man could not touch it. He basically asked the lawyers, Berwin Leighton Paisner to set up a tax evasion scheme and so more illegal corruption.

When Premium Credit was finally sold to a third party, in this case, MBNA, over  FIFTEEN MILLION POUNDS came my father’s way and was stuck in the trust.

NOT A SINGLE PENNY OF TAX WAS PAID 

Roll on a few years and we are where we are now. My father always denied that he was a Freemason but this is untrue. He used his masonic connections in a great deal of his business dealings and is now using those connections to stiffle any investigation into the abuse of my daughter.

Whether he will actually face justice is one matter but there are other factors to consider, primarily the welfare of my daughter and I do not think that she could bring herself to go through all of that again.

She loves her granddad and has just seen the “loving” performance that he has put on, not knowing what he is REALLY like or what he has done.

I do still love my father; I guess it is a “nurturing” thing  that cannot be broken but one thing is for sure……….

I NOW HATE MY FATHER. I NO LONGER RESPECT HIM AND NEVER WILL AGAIN

The hypocrisy of Police and mobile phones

Driving whilst being on a mobile phone is dangerous, obviously. Thankfully, my good old 2004 Toyota has a Bluetooth phone, one of the first.

People who are on their phones (I mean holding them) deserve everything that they get but, yet again, the Police target more male drivers than females. Even these women who drive around in their “Chelsea Tractors” are on their phones. If they can afford a Range Rover, they can afford to have Bluetooth. In most cases, it is probably installed in the car anyway. But women know that they will just get a slap on the wrist from the Police

But that is not what I want to talk about; it is the Police.

In many many “crime” programmes, you see a single police person driving at high speed on their radios.

If the Police can afford high performance cars, they can afford to put in some sort of Bluetooth so that the driver does not have to drive one handed, whilst holding the mike in the other hand.

Again, it is one rule for the Police, another for Joe Public

The BIG problem with Crime Programmes

Like I said in my post about the murder of Naomi Smith

https://davidhender.life/2019/11/11/the-murder-of-naomi-smith/

I am very sad about the deaths of these women and girls and the men who carried out those awful crimes should be strung up in my book

BUT

Most of the crime programmes involve men committing murder or men doing other criminal things and that causes a big problem.

You could count on one hand the number of programmes that involve women killing men or doing other criminal activity but there are hundreds of programmes involving men harming women or doing criminal things.

Even on the programmes that document women or girls being killed, it is generally the mother and sisters who are interviewed, as sadly that has a greater impact than interviewing brothers or fathers. And if a woman cries on film, all the better. I am sorry to sound callous but that is the nature of the beast when you start talking about “crime entertainment“.

What this gross imbalance does is to reinforce the fact that men are really bad and women are good or not so bad. As I mentioned in a previous post, even the justice minister said that all women prisons should be shut.

Unless you were born under a rock, we all know that women are just as capable of ANY crime as men are, whether murder, assault or any other crime.

Furthermore, women are very fantastic actresses. They will lie through their teeth, cry at a moment’s notice and blame anyone else apart from themselves. This is something that the Police just do not get

But as soon as a woman turns on the tears, the Police officer of whatever country instantly believes anything that a woman will say, even if she is lying through her teeth.

For a man, it is a case of guilty until proven innocent, whereas

For a woman, it is a case of innocent until proven guilty

That is why when a man enters a court, for say sex abuse allegations, most if not all of the jury decide that he is guilty before a word is spoken.

But, if a woman is on trial, she will initially get the benefit of the doubt and the jurors will think “how could a woman possibly do that?“. It is only if the evidence is overwhelming will the jury find that woman guilty.

That reinforcement of views goes even further, to when the sentence is handed out. For exactly the same crime, a woman will generally get a lighter sentence; the statistics speak for themselves.

Even before you actually watch a crime programme, the channel has already got you into the “right” (or should I say wrong) mindset with their trailers.

Just take a look at these

Certainly the last two seem innocent enough but a man throwing a bag into the canal suggests there is a dead female body in the bag and the ladies shoe suggests that she has been killed by a man.

What all of this does is to continually build up a picture in one’s subconscious and we then all believe that men have to be watched like a hawk and women can be implicitly trusted.

But from my own experiences, I have learned that few women can be trusted; yes, it is a sad statement to make.

Women tend to target rich men so that they can “nest” and then rip those men off in a divorce (first wife) or, during an argument, they pull a 12 inch kitchen knife out of a drawer and threaten you with it and then call the police before then putting away the knife before they arrive (second wife). And of course a daughter accusing her father of sexual abuse and actual bodily harm, for money, treats and favours (yes, my own daughter)

What all of this does is to not only skew Joe Public’s attitudes but also those of the Police. I have illustrated many times as to how the police treat men versus women. They will purposely agitate a man so that he flips, giving the police the excuse for many of them to haul a man to the ground and then 5 or more just jump on him whereas the police will treat a woman with kid gloves, not throw them to the floor and actually treat them with some respect.

Why do you think that advertisers spread as many women and girls across their screens as possible; that is until I spot it, report it on my blog and only then do they change them

And as to Joe Public’s reaction? If there is a missing woman or girl, a whole village will come out to help in the search, time after time (sadly) again but if it is a man or a boy, little effort is made. Just take poor James Bulger. No one came out searching for him, just the Police.

It is sad to say that “simple” example says it all

And to finish, why do you think that Cressida Dick is head of the Metropolitan Police. I am not suggesting that she is not experienced, someone of that level is bound to be but the men that were up against her had no chance. Whoever the group of people who decided on her were, they wanted a woman as the Met are very high profile and it was more “PC” to give her the job. Why do you think that most of the companies’ media representatives are women?

The murder of Naomi Smith

I am, in no way, going to minimise this tragedy; words cannot really describe what happened. She was murdered by Edwin Hopkins.

In the documentary of the investigation, one of the journalists, who followed the case, said that he had psychological problems, most importantly that he could not work out the “barriers” between males and females.

However, Edwin Hopkins had sexually attacked another young woman before he killed Naomi Smith. He gave her a cigarette, which she smoked and then followed her into a field; presumably that was the route that she was taking. He jumped on her and bit her breast but the lady kneed him in the groin and got away.

Hopkins was caught but ONLY GIVEN A CAUTION by the Police.

Call me stupid if you like but that was a serious assault and if he had been sent to youth detention or prison, Naomi Smith would still be alive. Yet again, the Police were at fault but that was brushed over in the programme; of course it was.

It was clear from the first attack that he was not right mentally and especially given what the journalist (Rob Chater), who followed the case, had said, he should have been sent to a mental institution indefinitely and should not have received a life sentence.

This is what Rob Chater said in the documentary, pertaining to Hopkins’ “mental health” 

The trouble is that especially with murders of girls and women, society “bays for blood”.

Quite frankly, I am surprised that his defence did not raise the mental health issue or maybe, as is the norm, the defence barrister was just going through the motions.

As I said at the beginning, this was an awful crime and, yes, he should have been put away but was prison the right place? I do not think so.

If the police did this to me, I would be dead

We all know that the police are thugs and like nothing better than all jumping on a man and slamming him to the pavement.

But, if they did this….

or this

I WOULD BE DEAD

I have a plate in my head that covers a big hole in my skull and it is just secured with screws and that is it. If the plate is damaged, even slightly, I would be dead.

And as to the first clip, you will see that the “officer” has his weight on a knee that is on the man’s neck. That would break my neck and I would be dead

Because the police love to drag men to the ground; they are just thugs, pure and simple

Now, do you think that they would do the same to a woman, especially in the second clip? Of course not

Every time that they deal with some “suspicious” man, they wind the men up until they break and then they have the excuse to assault a man.

And in the second clip, not one, not two but five officers getting into the ruck 

That really says it all about the Police, doesn’t it?